Wednesday, 06, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Appasaheb Suresh Dhumal vs State Of Maharashtra
2024 Latest Caselaw 656 Bom

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 656 Bom
Judgement Date : 11 January, 2024

Bombay High Court

Appasaheb Suresh Dhumal vs State Of Maharashtra on 11 January, 2024

Author: Revati Mohite Dere

Bench: Revati Mohite Dere

2024:BHC-AS:1847-DB

                                                                                19 ia 4335 of 2023.doc


                             IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                   CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION


                                      INTERIM APPLICATION NO.4335 OF 2023
                                                      IN
                                        CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.882 OF 2018


                   Appasaheb Suresh Dhumal                                          ... Applicant
                            Versus
                   The State of Maharashtra                                         ... Respondent

                                                   ......
                   Mr.Kedar J. Patil a/w. Ms.Sakshi S. Kadam and Mr.Pratik Tare,
                   Advocate for the Applicant/Appellant.

                   MrR.M. Pethe, APP for Respondent-State.
                                                 ......

                                                      CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE &
                                                              MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, JJ.

                                                      DATE   :   11th JANUARY 2024

                   P.C. :

                                     Heard the learned counsel for the parties.


                   2                 By this Application, the Applicant seeks suspension of

                   his sentence and enlargement on bail pending the hearing and

                   final disposal of his aforesaid Appeal.

   Rajeshri Aher                                                                                           1/5



                       ::: Uploaded on - 16/01/2024                   ::: Downloaded on - 30/01/2024 07:54:01 :::
                                                                          19 ia 4335 of 2023.doc


                3                 The Applicant vide judgment and order dated 5 April

                2018 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Karad, in

                Sessions Case No.51 of 2015 has been convicted for the offence

                punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and

                is sentenced to suffer imprisonment for life and to pay fine of

                Rs.5,000/-, in default, to suffer rigorous imprisonment for six

                months.



                4                 The learned counsel for the Applicant submits that

                the prosecution case rests on circumstantial evidence, in

                particular, the evidence of two witnesses, who allegedly came to

                the spot, post the incident of assault and saw the Applicant with a

                weapon. He submits that the said statement of the two witnesses

                could not have been relied upon by the learned Judge, having

                regard to the fact, that the said statements were recorded five

                days post the said incident. He further submits that even

                otherwise, having regard to the Judgment of the Apex Court in

                Saudan Singh Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh passed in Criminal


Rajeshri Aher                                                                                       2/5



                    ::: Uploaded on - 16/01/2024               ::: Downloaded on - 30/01/2024 07:54:01 :::
                                                                            19 ia 4335 of 2023.doc


                Appeal No.308 of 2022 [SLP (Cri.) No.4633/2021], the

                Applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail, considering that he is

                in incarceration for about 10 years.



                5                 Learned APP opposes the Application.



                6                 Perused the papers. The prosecution case rests on

                circumstantial evidence, and, essentially on the statement of two

                witnesses, who saw the Applicant post the incident of assault with

                a weapon in his hand. It also appears that the said statements

                have been recorded after five days of the incident.             Be that as it

                may, having regard to the aforesaid and the fact, that the

                Applicant is in custody for about 10 years, and, having regard to

                the decision of the Apex Court in Saudan Singh Vs. State of Uttar

                Pradesh (Supra), there is no impediment in allowing the

                Application.



                7                 Considering the aforesaid, the Application is allowed

                and the Applicant's sentence is suspended and he is enlarged on

Rajeshri Aher                                                                                         3/5



                    ::: Uploaded on - 16/01/2024                 ::: Downloaded on - 30/01/2024 07:54:01 :::
                                                                             19 ia 4335 of 2023.doc


                bail pending the hearing and final disposal of his Appeal on the

                following terms and conditions:-


                                                :: O R D E R :

:

(i) The Applicant be enlarged on bail on furnishing P.R. Bond

in the sum of Rs.25,000/-, with one or two sureties in the

like amount;

(ii) The Applicant shall report to the trial Court, once in four

months on the day/date specified by the trial Court, till his

Appeal is finally disposed of;

(iii) The Applicant shall keep the trial Court informed of his

current address and mobile contact number and/or change

of residence or mobile details, if any, from time to time;

(iv) If there are two consecutive defaults in appearing before the

trial Court, the learned Judge shall make a report to the

High Court, and, the prosecution would be at liberty to file

an application seeking cancellation of bail.

19 ia 4335 of 2023.doc

8 The Application is allowed in the aforesaid terms

and is accordingly disposed of.

9 All concerned to act on the authenticated copy of

this order.

MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, J. REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter