Bombay High Court
Mah.Rajya Pathyapustak Nirmiti Va ... vs Shri. Sunil Bhairu Davari And Ors on 22 January, 2024
Author: Sandeep V. Marne
Bench: Sandeep V. Marne
2024:BHC-AS:3675
kishor 1/4 1 (22.01.24).doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.2032 OF 2019
WITH
IA/17023/2023 IN WP/2032/2019
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO.8728 OF 2021
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO.13017 OF 2018
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO.416 OF 2019
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO.419 OF 2019
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO.415 OF 2019
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO.13007 OF 2018
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO.418 OF 2019
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO.414 OF 2019
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO.13181 OF 2018
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO.417 OF 2019
::: Uploaded on - 24/01/2024 ::: Downloaded on - 18/02/2024 19:33:26 :::
kishor 2/4 1 (22.01.24).doc
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO.413 OF 2019
Mah.Rajya Pathyapustak Nirmiti Va
Abhyaskrama Mahamandal,
Balbharati And Anr. .... Petitioner
Versus
Shri. Rajendra Jayram Kamble And Ors. ...
....
Mr. K. S. Bapat, Sr. Advocate a/w. Mr. Yashdeep Deshmukh, Mr. Gaura
V. Jawande & Ms. Vaidehi Pradeep, Ms. Ameya Tawde, Mr. Nitin Mr.
Arvind Kulkarni, Mr. Avinash Belge for Petitioners.
....
CORAM : SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.
DATED : 22 JANUARY 2024.
P.C. :
The challenge in these petitions is to various awards passed by
the Labour Court Kolhapur in various References raised at the instance of
Respondent-Employees. The references made by the appropriate government
was about termination of Respondents by the Petitioner Board on 23
September 2014. For answering the Reference, the Labour Court framed an
issue inter alia about existence of employer-employee relationship between
the Petitioner and Respondent-Employees. While it was the contention of the
Petitioner-Board that Respondents are employees of the contractors,
Respondents contended that the contracts are purely bogus and sham and that
they are in fact direct employees of the Petitioner-Board.
kishor 3/4 1 (22.01.24).doc
2. The issue of existence of employer-employee relationship has
been answered by the Labour Court by recording various findings relying
upon the Judgment of the Apex Court in Steel Authority of India Ltd. Vs.
National Union Water Front Workrs & Anr., 2001 III CLR 349. However it
appears that the Labour Court has not taken into consideration Judgment of
Apex Court in Balwant Rai Saluja and Ors. Vs. Air India Ltd. & Ors., (2014)
9 SCC 407 which lays down 06 tests for the purpose establishing the
employer-employee relationship between the parties. In this regard it would
be apposite to reproduce paragraph No.65 of the Judgment in Balwant Rai
(supra) which reads thus :
65. Thus, it can be concluded that the relevant factors to be taken
into consideration to establish an employer-employee relationship
would include, inter alia:
(i) who appoints the workers;
(ii) who pays the salary/remuneration;
(iii) who has the authority to dismiss;
(iv) who can take disciplinary action;
(v) whether there is continuity of service; and
(vi) extent of control and supervision i.e. whether there exists
complete control and supervision.
As regards extent of control and supervision, we have already taken
note of the observations in Bengal Nagpur Cotton Mills case,
International Airport Authroty of India case and Nalco case.
3. It appears that the Judgment of the Apex Court in Balwant Rai
was not cited before the Labour Court which did not have the advantage of
considering the 06 tests prescribed by the Apex Court in paragraph 65 of its
Judgment. Consequently Labour Court has not examined the issue as to
whether Respondents satisfied the said 06 tests for the purpose of
kishor 4/4 1 (22.01.24).doc
establishment of employer-employee relationship between the parties. In my
view therefore the proceedings are required to be remanded to the Labour
Court for the purpose of re-determination of the issue of existence of
employer-employee relationship in the light of Judgment of the Apex Court
in Balanwant Rai Saluja.
4. Accordingly impugned awards dated 05 May 2018 are set aide
and the proceedings are remanded before the Labour Court for th purpose of
re-determination of issue of employer-employee relationship in the light of
law laid down by the Apex Court in its Judgment in Balwant Rai Saluja. In the
remanded proceedings, it would not be necessary for the parties to lead
additional evidence. The issue can be decided on the evidence and documents
available on record. Considering narrow scope of remit to Labour Court, it
shall proceed to decide the remanded proceedings as expeditiously as possible
preferably within a period of 06 months from today. With the above
directions, Writ Petitions are disposed of. Since the Writ Petitions are
disposed of, nothing survives in the Interim Applications and those are also
disposed of.
SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.
