Friday, 15, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Snehal Anil Johare vs The State Of Maharashtra Through Its ...
2024 Latest Caselaw 24876 Bom

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 24876 Bom
Judgement Date : 27 August, 2024

Bombay High Court

Snehal Anil Johare vs The State Of Maharashtra Through Its ... on 27 August, 2024

Author: Mangesh S. Patil

Bench: Mangesh S. Patil

2024:BHC-AUG:19736-DB

                                                  1                      WP / 11035 / 2021


                         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                     BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                                   WRIT PETITION NO. 11035 OF 2021

              Snehal Anil Johare,
              Age : 24 years, Occ. Student,
              R/o. Amkheda, Tq. Soygaon,
              Dist. Aurangabad                                             .. Petitioner

                    Versus

              1] The State of Maharashtra,
                 Through its Secretary,
                 Tribal Department,
                 Mantralaya, Mumbai - 32.

              2] The Scheduled Tribe Certificate
                 Scrutiny Committee, Aurangabad
                 Through its Deputy Director (R)

              3] The Principal,
                 R.C. Patel Institute of Pharmacy,
                 Shirpur, Tq. Shirpur,
                 Dist. Dhule

              4] The Registrar,
                 North Maharashtra University,
                 Jalgaon, Tq. & Dist. Jalgaon                              .. Respondents


                                                     ...
                              Advocate for petitioner : Mr. Pratap V. Jadhavar
                             Addl.GP for the respondent - State : Mr. A.R. Kale
                                                     ...

                                          CORAM        : MANGESH S. PATIL &
                                                         SHAILESH P. BRAHME, JJ.

                                          DATE         : 27 AUGUST 2024

              ORAL ORDER (SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.) :

We have heard both the sides finally, considering the

urgency.

2 WP / 11035 / 2021

2. The petitioner is challenging the judgment and order dated

28-08-2021 passed by respondent - scrutiny committee confiscating

and invalidating her tribe certificate.

3. Petitioner relies on the validity certificate of her father -

Anil, uncle - Sanjay and paternal side relatives - Mohitkumar and

Pallavi. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that by following

due procedure of law, the certificates of validity were issued in the

family of the petitioner. He tenders on record order dated 11-08-2023

passed in the matter of her cousin - Pallavi.

4. Learned AGP supports the impugned judgment and order.

He would submit that the scrutiny committee has rightly discarded the

validity certificate because the school record of Ashok, Sitaram and

Kailash, Bharat, Bebi and Anil is incompatible with the claim. The

committee also noticed tampering of record in the matter of Sanjay,

Mohitkumar and Anil. The validities were obtained by suppressing

earlier invalidation in the matter of Rajendra Govind Johare.

5. We have considered the rival submissions of the parties.

6. There is no dispute about the relationship of the petitioner

with the validity holders. Petitioner's father - Anil and real uncle -

Sanjay were issued with validity certificates. Besides that Mohitkumar

and Pallavi are issued with the certificates of validity who are paternal 3 WP / 11035 / 2021

side relatives of the petitioner. We have also gone through the order

dated 11-08-2023 passed by our Bench in the matter of Pallavi Johare

in writ petition no. 10835 of 2021. We find that the selfsame record has

already been scrutinized by the committee in granting validity

certificates to the relatives of the petitioner. The validity certificates

would enure to the benefit of the petitioner.

7. The committee discarded the validity certificate on the

ground that there was invalidation of certificate of Rajendra Govind

Johare.

We have already taken a view in the matter of Pallavi

Sitaram Johare (writ petition no. 10835 of 2021) and Bankam Malode

vs. State that invalidation cannot be said to be adverse to the tribe

claim.

8. The committee has issued show cause notice to the

validity holder. The submission in respect of suppression of material

facts and the incompatible school record of the relative of the petitioner

can be taken care of during reverification.

9. The petitioner is ready to run the risk as contemplated in

Shweta Balaji Isankar Vs. State of Maharashtra and others (writ

petition no. 6320 of 2017). We are of the considered view that the 4 WP / 11035 / 2021

petitioner deserves to be issued certificate of validity conditionally.

We, therefore, pass the following order :-

ORDER

I] The writ petition is allowed partly.

II] The impugned judgment and order is quashed and set

aside.

III] The committee shall forthwith issue the validity certificate

to the petitioner which shall be subject to the outcome of the re-

verification proposed by the scrutiny committee.

IV] The petitioner shall not claim equities.

     [ SHAILESH P. BRAHME ]                         [ MANGESH S. PATIL ]
            JUDGE                                         JUDGE

arp/
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter