Wednesday, 06, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Vishnudas Rajaram Patil vs The State Of Maharashtra
2024 Latest Caselaw 24848 Bom

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 24848 Bom
Judgement Date : 27 August, 2024

Bombay High Court

Vishnudas Rajaram Patil vs The State Of Maharashtra on 27 August, 2024

Author: R.G. Avachat

Bench: R.G. Avachat

2024:BHC-AUG:19613-DB
                                                                          908-APPLN-2440-24.odt



                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                 BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                          CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2440 OF 2024
                            IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 319 OF 2023

          Vishnudas Rajaram Patil                                ..APPLICANT
                 VERSUS
          State of Maharashtra                                   ..RESPONDENT
                                               ....

Mr. N.S. Ghanekar, Advocate for applicant Mr. S.V. Hange, A.P.P. for respondent - State ....

CORAM : R.G. AVACHAT AND NEERAJ P. DHOTE, JJ DATE : 27th AUGUST, 2024

PER COURT :

1. This is an application for suspension of substantive sentence of

imprisonment imposed by Additional Sessions Judge, Udgir in Sessions Case

No. 22 of 2017 vide judgment and order dated 10 th March, 2023 thereby

convicting the applicant for the offence punishable under Sections 302, 323,

324 and 506 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code ('I.P.C.').

2. The case of prosecution is that on 19 th March, 2019 when the

appellant and co-convicts were working in their agricultural field, the

deceased, his wife and son came there. The deceased objected the applicant

and co-convicts from digging their land. A quarrel took place between them.

It is the case of prosecution that the convicts assaulted the deceased by means

of stick. They also assaulted the wife and son of the deceased. The deceased

succumbed to the injuries.

908-APPLN-2440-24.odt

3. It is submitted by leaned counsel for the applicant that the two co-

convicts have been granted bail by this Court vide orders dated 13 th March,

2024 and 02nd May, 2024 passed in Criminal Application Nos. 526 of 2024

and 1452 of 2024 respectively. He submits that the role attributed to the

applicant is that he assaulted the deceased on head with a stick. He further

submits that the applicant has also suffered five injuries on his person. He

submits that even if the evidence of the witnesses is scrutinized, the case may

not fall for the offence punishable under Section 302 of the I.P.C. The

applicant is behind the bars for more than five years, and therefore, urged for

allowing the application.

4. The application is opposed by learned A.P.P. He submits that the

role attributed to the applicant is assault with stick which proved fatal. He

submits that though the co-convicts, who have been granted bail, were

accompanying the applicant, he cannot claim bail on the ground of parity. He

ultimately urged for rejection of the application.

5. We have perused the evidence on record. The cause of death of

the deceased is injury to the vital organ i.e. brain by hard and blunt object.

As seen from the postmortem report (Exh.67), the deceased suffered

following injuries :-

(i) Right side scalp suturing mark seen 'U' cranetomy done at Life Care Hospital.

(ii) Fronto parito occipital to sup right ear.

(iii) Scalp layer seen periosteal heamatoma present.

908-APPLN-2440-24.odt

(iv) Parital bone cranetomy fronto-parito occipital right side done

(v) Right shoulder contusion 2 x 1 cm seen.

6. From the evidence of witnesses it is seen that the incident was the

outcome of dispute from digging the land. The co-convict - Rajaram had

come on the spot of the incident with JCB machine. It is seen that initially

there was scuffle between the deceased, who was present with his wife and

son on the one hand and the co-convict on the other which culminated in

assault. Admittedly, there is single blow on the head of the deceased by the

stick, which proved fatal. It is also not in dispute that the applicant had

suffered injuries, which are shown five in number. The appeal is of 2023.

There are no chances that the same would come up for final hearing in near

future. Considering all these aspects, we are inclined to allow the

application.

7. In view of above, the execution of substantive sentence of

imprisonment to stand suspended pending the appeal. The applicant be

released on his executing P.R. bond in the sum of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees

Fifteen Thousand) with one surety in the like amount.

8. Criminal application stands disposed of accordingly.

      ( NEERAJ P. DHOTE, J. )                        ( R.G. AVACHAT, J. )
SSD




 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter