Thursday, 14, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Minakshi Wd/O Hemraj Uikey And Another vs The State Of Maha., Thr. Secretary, ...
2024 Latest Caselaw 24213 Bom

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 24213 Bom
Judgement Date : 16 August, 2024

Bombay High Court

Minakshi Wd/O Hemraj Uikey And Another vs The State Of Maha., Thr. Secretary, ... on 16 August, 2024

Author: M.S. Jawalkar

Bench: Avinash G. Gharote, M.S. Jawalkar

2024:BHC-NAG:9221-DB


                       21 wp 1534-2023.odt                                                                1/4




                            IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                              NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR

                                             WRIT PETITION NO.1534/2023
                       1.      Smt. Minakshi wd/o Hemraj Uikey
                               Aged about 50 years, Occ. Household,

                       2.      Ku. Shivani D/o. Hemraj Uikey
                               Age about 22 years, Occ- Student,
                               Both R/o. At Post- Gadegaon, Tah-
                               Lakhani, Dist. Bhandara 441804.
                                                                                 ....PETITIONERS
                                       ....VERSUS....

                       1.      State of Maharashtra,
                               through its Secretary,
                               Department of General Administration,
                               Mantralaya, Mumbai-32.

                       2.      Zilla Parishad, Bhandara
                               Chief Executive Officer.                              ....RESPONDENTS
                       ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                       Shri N.S. Warulkar, Adv. with Shri S.K. Bhattacharya, Adv. for petitioner
                       Shri Saurabh Joshi, AGP for respondent No.1
                       Shri R.S. Khobragade, Advocate for respondent No.2
                       ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                       CORAM :         AVINASH G. GHAROTE AND
                                       SMT. M.S. JAWALKAR, J.

                       DATED:          16/08/2024

                       ORAL JUDGMENT (PER SMT. M.S. JAWALKAR, J.)

. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard

finally by consent of learned Counsel for the parties.

2. The present petition is filed challenging the

communication dated 22/11/2022 passed by the Chief

Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Bhandra, whereby

request of petitioner No.2 for substitution and inclusion

of her name in place of her mother i.e. petitioner No.1 in

waiting list maintained by the Zilla Parishad of the

candidate to be appointed on compassionate

appointment. As husband of petitioner No.1 Shri Hemraj

Beniram Uikey was working in Zilla Parishad School

Bhandara passed away on 13/10/2010 leaving behind the

petitioners. The petitioner No.1 applied for appointment

on compassionate ground in place of her husband, her

name was enlisted. Further, as she has attained the age of

45 years, her name was directed to be removed from the

waiting list. Hence, she applied for substitution of the

name of her daughter namely Shivani D/o. Hemraj

Uikey.

3. In the present petition, the petitioner No.1 is

the mother who does household work and petitioner

No.2 is her daughter who is a major and who has

completed her graduation B.Sc. Degree and currently

pursuing her M.Sc. Degree.

4. The respondents initially included name of the

petitioner No.2 in the waiting list substituting name of

petitioner No.1. However, when she has approached to

the respondent No.2 for verification of documents, she

was informed that her name was removed from the

waiting list in view of Government Resolution dated

20/05/2015. Her request for substitution came to be

rejected without granting hearing.

5. Learned Counsel for petitioners relied on the

Full Bench judgment in Kalpana wd/o Vilas Taram and

another Vs. State of Maharashtra and others, 2024(4)

Mh.L.J. (F.B.)312. In view of the judgment, name of

daughter of petitioner No.1 can be substituted in place of

name of petitioner No.1. As such, present petition is

allowed in terms of the Full Bench judgment in Kalpana

Taram (supra).

6. The impugned communication dated

22/11/2022 is hereby quashed and set aside.

7. The respondent No.2 is hereby directed to

substitute name of petitioner No.2 in place of petitioner

No.1 in the waiting list of candidates seeking

compassionate appointment and to consider petitioner

No.2's candidature for future appointment in Zilla

Parishad, Bhandara.

8. Rule is made absolute in above terms. No

order as to costs.

                                                      (Judge)                           (Judge)
                                      R.S. Sahare


Signed by: Mrs. Ranjana Sahare

Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 20/08/2024 17:45:19

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter