Wednesday, 06, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

General Manager, Central Railway, ... vs Harnarayan S/O Punamchandji Laddha And ...
2024 Latest Caselaw 23818 Bom

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 23818 Bom
Judgement Date : 13 August, 2024

Bombay High Court

General Manager, Central Railway, ... vs Harnarayan S/O Punamchandji Laddha And ... on 13 August, 2024

Author: G. A. Sanap

Bench: G. A. Sanap

2024:BHC-NAG:9022



                                                             1                  2=CAO 597-24 in MCAst 9602-24.odt


                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                             NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR

                       CIVIL APPLICATION (CAO) NO. 597 OF 2024
                                          IN
                     MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION (ST.) NO. 9602 OF 2024
                                          IN
                            FIRST APPEAL NO. 1275 OF 2013 (D)
                       GENERAL MANAGER, CENTRAL RAILWAY, THROUGH DY. CHIEF ENGINEER, NAGPUR
                                                          -Vs. -
                                   HARNARAYAN S/O. PUNAMCHANDJI LADDHA AND OTHERS

         Office Notes, Office Memoranda of                Court's or Judge's Order
         Coram, appearances, Court's Orders
         or directions and Registrar's order
                                   Shri N.P.Lambat, Advocate for applicant/appellant.
                                   Shri J.J.Chandurkar, Advocate for LRs. of respondent no. 1/Cross-objector.

                                                     CORAM : SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.

DATED : 13/08/2024

1. This is an application for condonation of delay of 769 days caused for filing the application for restoration of appeal.

2. The learned Advocate for the appellant pointed out that the paper book was not filed, therefore, the appeal was dismissed. He further submits that this matter has been covered as per the judgment passed by this Court in First Appeal No. 27/2021 dated 18/04/2024. Therefore, filing of paper book can be dispensed with.

3. Considering the above facts and the reasons stated in the application, delay in filing application for restoration of appeal deserves to be allowed in the interest of justice. As 2 2=CAO 597-24 in MCAst 9602-24.odt

such, the Application is allowed. Delay in filing application for restoration of appeal is condoned.

4. Accordingly, the application stands disposed of.

MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION (ST.) NO. 9602 OF 2024

1. This is an application for restoration of appeal which was dismissed for non-filing of paper book as per the direction of the Court.

2. Perused the application.

3. Heard learned Advocate for both sides.

4. For the reasons stated in the application, the application deserves to be allowed in the interest of justice. As such, the application is allowed.

5. The appeal be restored.

6. Registry to note that filing of paper book is dispensed with.

7. Accordingly, the application stands disposed of.

CIVIL APPLICATION (CAO) NO. 755 OF 2024 IN CROSS-OBJECTION (XOB) NO. 22 OF 2014

1. This is an application for condonation of delay of 249 days for bringing the legal heirs of sole cross-objector on record and for setting aside abatement.

2. Perused the application.

3. Heard learned Advocate for both sides.

3 2=CAO 597-24 in MCAst 9602-24.odt

4. For the reasons stated in the application, the application deserves to be allowed in the interest of justice. As such, the application is allowed. Delay in bringing the legal heirs of sole cross-objector on record is condoned and abatement is set aside.

5. Accordingly, the application stands disposed of.

CIVIL APPLICATION (CAO) NO. 756 OF 2024 IN CROSS-OBJECTION (XOB) NO. 22 OF 2014

1. This is an application for bringing the legal heirs of sole cross-objector on record.

2. Perused the application.

3. Heard learned Advocate for both sides.

4. For the reasons stated in the application, the application deserves to be allowed in the interest of justice. As such, the application is allowed. Permission is granted to bring the legal heirs of sole cross-objector on record.

5. The amendment to be carried out within a period of one week.

6. Accordingly, the application stands disposed of.

(SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.)

B.T. Khapekar

Signed by: Mr. B.T. Khapekar Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 14/08/2024 19:13:53

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter