Friday, 15, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Siddarth Carbochem Products Ltd ... vs The Union Of India Through Ministry Of ...
2024 Latest Caselaw 23454 Bom

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 23454 Bom
Judgement Date : 9 August, 2024

Bombay High Court

Siddarth Carbochem Products Ltd ... vs The Union Of India Through Ministry Of ... on 9 August, 2024

Author: Ravindra V. Ghuge

Bench: Ravindra V. Ghuge

This Order is Speaking to Minutes order of order dated //


                                                                 178.24ra
                                             (1)

      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                 BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                  REVIEW APPLICATION NO.178 OF 2024
                                IN
                 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3756 OF 2024
                                IN
                  WRIT PETITION NO.9735 OF 2023

 Siddarth Carbochem Products Ltd, Through its Authorised Officer
                          VERSUS
                  The Union of India & Others

                                             ....

 Ms Vishakha Patil, Advocate h/f Ms P. S. Talekar, Advocate for
 Applicant;
 Mr V. M. Kagne, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos.5 and 6

                                    CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE
                                                    AND
                                            Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, JJ.

DATE : 9th August, 2024

PER COURT:

1. This is a motion for speaking to the minutes of the

order, dated 12/07/2024. The learned Advocate for the Petitioner

points out an inadvertent mistake in the dates in paragraph Nos.2

and 6 of the said order.

2. In view of the above, this motion is allowed.

This Order is Speaking to Minutes order of order dated //

178.24ra

3. In Paragraph No.2, the date '22/04/2024' be replaced

with the date '22/03/2024'.

4. In Paragraph No.6, the date '22/03/2024' be replaced

with the date '22/04/2024'.

5. Corrections as above, be made accordingly and the

corrected order be uploaded.

(Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, J.) (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.)

sjk This Order is Speaking to Minutes order of order dated //

178.24ra

(This order dated 12/07/2024 stands corrected in view of the order dated 09/08/2024, passed on a motion for speaking to the minutes of the order)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 178 OF 2024 IN CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3756 OF 2024 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 9735 OF 2023

Siddarth Carbochem Products Ltd.

Through its Authorised Officer .. Applicant

versus

The Union of India & others .. Respondents

Ms. P. S. Talekar, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. S. W. Munde, Standing Counsel for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3. Mr. D. S. Ladda, Advocate for Respondent No. 4. Mr. V. M. Kagne, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 5 and 6.

CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE AND R. M. JOSHI, JJ.

DATE : 12th JULY, 2024.

PER COURT :

1. This Civil Application is filed for recall/review of the

judgment and order dated 22.04.2024 passed in Civil Application

No. 3756/2024.

2. Writ Petition No. 9735/2023 came to be decided by

judgment dated 22.03.2024. After disposal of the Petition, Civil

Application No. 3756/2024 came to be filed for seeking modification This Order is Speaking to Minutes order of order dated //

178.24ra

of the order. This Application was allowed on 22.04.2024 with

following directions :-

a) The Assistant Drug Controller is hereby directed to issue NOC for release of the consignment (of the Applicant) of Salicylic Acid industrial/technical, within a period of 15 days from today.

b) The customs authorities shall release the consignment, forthwith.

c) The Applicant/Petitioner shall be bound by the undertaking tendered to this Court, as recorded in our order dated 22.03.2024.

3. Thereafter a motion for speaking to the minutes was

moved in respect of order dated 22.04.2024. After hearing learned

counsel for Petitioner for some time, this Court was of the view that

the submissions advanced before this Court for correction would

not be within the ambit of motion for speaking to the minutes and

this will require hearing. A statement was made on behalf of the

Petitioner that Review Application would be filed and accordingly,

present Application is placed before this Court.

4. We have heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and

Respondents for some time. It is thereafter, the learned counsel for

Petitioner, on instructions, makes a statement that now, the

Petitioner does not wish to seek any clarification/review of the

order and asks for maintaining the order of disposal of the Petition. This Order is Speaking to Minutes order of order dated //

178.24ra

This statement is sought to be opposed by learned counsel for the

Respondents.

5. It is pertinent to note that the Petitioner had sought

modification/clarification of the order dated 22.03.2024 and at no

point of time Respondents have raised any issue with regard to the

said order or order passed thereafter on Civil Application.

6. In view of the above, the request made by Petitioner is

accepted. Order dated 22.04.2024 passed in Civil Application No.

3756/2024 and order dated 10.05.2024 passed on motion for

speaking to the minutes stand recalled. Civil Application no.

3756/2024 and the motion for speaking to the minutes stand

disposed of as withdrawn by the Petitioner.

       ( R. M. JOSHI)                                       ( RAVINDRA V. GHUGE)
          JUDGE                                                     JUDGE

 sjk
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter