Friday, 15, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Prasenjit Kisanrao Tayade ... vs The State Of Maharashtra, Thr. The ...
2023 Latest Caselaw 9676 Bom

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 9676 Bom
Judgement Date : 14 September, 2023

Bombay High Court
Prasenjit Kisanrao Tayade ... vs The State Of Maharashtra, Thr. The ... on 14 September, 2023
Bench: A.S. Chandurkar, Vrushali V. Joshi
2023:BHC-NAG:13840-DB




            60-WP-5056-2023(J).odt                                                                            1/3



                             IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                       NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
                                        WRIT PETITION NO. 5056 of 2023

                    Prasenjit Kisanrao Tayade (Patil)
                    Age 57 years, Occupation-Business,
                    At Post Madakhed(Bujruk),
                    Tq. Jalgaon (Jamod), District Buldhana.                         ..... PETITIONER

                            ...V E R S U S...

            1.      The State of Maharashtra through the Secretary,
                    Urban Development Department,
                    Mantralaya, Mumbai-32.

            2.      The Director of Town Planning,
                    State of Maharashtra, Central Building,
                    Pune-1.

            3.      The Municipal Council (M.C.)/Nagar Parishad,
                    Jalgaon Jamod, through its Chief Officer,
                    Jalgaon-Jamod, District Buldhana.

            4.       Assistant Director of Town Planner,
                     Buldhana, Government Administrative Building,
                     In front of Bus Stand, Buldhana.                             ....... RESPONDENTS
            ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Shri G.K.Mundhada, Advocate for petitioner.
            Shri S.A.Ashirgade, Additional Government Pleader for respondent nos.1, 2
            and 4.
            Shri Mangesh Bute, Advocate for respondent no.3.
            ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

            CORAM :-        A.S.CHANDURKAR AND MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, JJ.
            DATE :-         14th SEPTEMBER, 2023

            ORAL JUDGMENT (Per A.S.CHANDURKAR, J.)

                         Rule.      Rule made returnable forthwith and heard the learned

            counsel for the parties.
 60-WP-5056-2023(J).odt                                                    2/3


2. The petitioner is the owner of land bearing Survey No.9,

admeasuring 0.28 HR of Village Khel Amanat, Tq. Jalgaon (Jamod), District

Buldhana. The aforesaid land was shown to be reserved for shopping centre

pursuant to Reservation No.44. The development plan was published on

15.01.2006. On 17.12.2020 the petitioner issued a notice under Section 127

of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 (for short, the Act

of 1966) calling upon the Municipal Council to purchase the aforesaid land.

In reply the Municipal Council on 12.07.2021 offered transferable

development rights to the petitioner in lieu of compensation. On the expiry

of period of twenty-four months from the service of the said notice, the

petitioner has filed the present writ petition seeking a declaration that the

reservation has lapsed under Section 127 of the Act of 1966.

3. Heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the

documents filed alongwith the writ petition as well as the reply. The factual

aspects of land being subjected to reservation, service of purchase notice, its

receipt and reply by the Municipal Council are not in dispute. In the reply

the Municipal Council has sought to offer transferable development rights in

lieu of monetary compensation to the petitioner. The Full Bench in Shree

Vinayak Builders & Developers vs. State of Maharashtra, Nagpur Municipal

Corporation, Urban Town Planning Department [2022(4) Mh.L.J.739] has

held that offer of transferable development rights in lieu of compensation 60-WP-5056-2023(J).odt 3/3

would not be permissible and the land owner cannot be compelled to accept

the transferable development rights in lieu of compensation. It is thus clear

that after the expiry of period of twenty-four months from the receipt of

notice dated 21.12.2020, no step towards acquisition of the petitioner's land

has been initiated. Consequently, the deeming fiction under Section 127(1)

of the Act of 1966 would operate.

4. For aforesaid reasons, it is declared that Reservation No. 44

affecting the land of the petitioner to the extent of 0.28 HR of Survey No.9 of

village Khel Amanat Tq. Jalgaon (Jamod), District Buldhana is deemed

to have lapsed under Section 127(1) of the Act of 1966. The respondent

no.2-The Director of Town Planning, Pune, shall within a period of six weeks

of receiving the copy of this judgment issue Notification indicating lapsing of

the aforesaid reservation. The petitioner is free to develop the land in the

manner permissible for the adjoining land as per the development plan.

5. Rule is made absolute in aforesaid terms with no order as to

costs.

(MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, J.) (A.S.CHANDURKAR, J.)

Andurkar..

Signed by: Jayant S. Andurkar Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 16/09/2023 10:25:00

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter