Friday, 15, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Aslam@Sandy Ikrar Ansari vs The State Of Maharashtra And Anr
2023 Latest Caselaw 9534 Bom

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 9534 Bom
Judgement Date : 12 September, 2023

Bombay High Court
Aslam@Sandy Ikrar Ansari vs The State Of Maharashtra And Anr on 12 September, 2023
Bench: R.P. Mohite-Dere, Gauri Godse
2023:BHC-AS:27086-DB
                                                                           5-IA-238-2020.doc




   rrpillai              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                 CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 238 OF 2020
                                                        IN
                                  CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.212 OF 2019

               Aslam @ Sandy Ikrar Ansari                          ...Applicant
                       Versus
               State of Maharashtra and Another                    ...Respondents


               Mr. Amit Icham a/w. Mr. Aniket Nikam and Mr. Aashish Satpute for
               the Applicant.
               Ms. P. P. Shinde, APP for the State.
               Mr. Lokesh Zade a/w. Mr Asif Shaikh, Appointed for Respondent
               no. 2

                                             CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE &
                                                             GAURI GODSE, JJ.
                                               DATE :        12th SEPTEMBER 2023
               P. C. :


               1.        Heard learned counsel for the parties.


               2.        By this application, the applicant seeks suspension of his

               sentence and enlargement on bail, pending the hearing and final

               disposal of his aforesaid appeal.

                                                  1/6
                                                             5-IA-238-2020.doc


3.      The    applicant    vide      judgment   and   order     dated

2nd November 2018 passed by the learned Additional Sessions

Judge, Pune in Sessions Case No. 790 of 2012 has been convicted

alongwith other co-accused as under:

     --for the offence punishable u/s. 143 of the Indian Penal

     code, to suffer R.I. for three months and pay fine of

     Rs.500/-, in default, to suffer R.I. for eight days;

     --for the offence punishable u/s. 148 of the Indian Penal

     code, to suffer R.I. for one year and pay fine of Rs.1000/-,

     in default, to suffer R.I. for fifteen days;

     --for the offence punishable u/s. 147 of the Indian Penal

     code, no separate sentence is awarded;

     --for the offence punishable u/s. 326 r/w. 149 of the Indian

     Penal code, to suffer R.I. for five years and pay fine of

     Rs.5000/-, in default, to suffer R.I. for one month;

     --for the offence punishable u/s. 302 r/w. 149 of the Indian

     Penal code, to suffer R.I. of life imprisonment and pay fine

     of Rs.10,000/-, in default, to suffer R.I. for three months.



                                2/6
                                                         5-IA-238-2020.doc


     All sentences were directed to run concurrently.


4.   At the outset, we may note, that the applicant seeks

suspension of his sentence and enlargement on bail, on the

ground of parity with other co-accused i.e. Yashir Majid Shaikh

(Original accused no.4), whose sentence has been suspended and

who is enlarged on bail by this Court vide order dated 19 th

December 2019 in Application No. 24 of 2019 in Criminal

Appeal No. 20 of 2019


5.   Learned counsel for the applicant also submits that the

applicant has been in prison for the last nine years, with no

prospect of his appeal being heard in the immediate near future.


6.   Perused the papers. It appears that there are four eye

witnesses to the alleged incident of assault on deceased - Ismail

Sharif Shaikh which took place on 29 th April 2012 at about 7.30

pm to 8.00 pm.


7.   As far as PW-1- Jahed Mohammad Sayyad, Original

complainant and an eye witness to the alleged incident is


                               3/6
                                                          5-IA-238-2020.doc


concerned, he has not named the applicant as being one of the

assailants.


8.    As far as PW-2 - Abdul Kadar, son of PW-8 (Bibi Badasha

Shaikh) is concerned, he has stated that the applicant, Yashir

Majid Shaikh (who has been enlarged on bail) and other accused

were armed with weapons and assaulted the deceased. The role

ascribed to the applicant is similar to that of Yashir Majid Shaikh

who has been enlarged on bail. It is pertinent to note, that PW-2

in his statement before the Magistrate        has not named the

applicant as being one of the assailants.


9.    As far as PW-8 -(Bibi Badasha Shaikh-mother of PW-2 and

as injured eye witness) is concerned, she does not specifically

name the applicant in her deposition, however identifies the

applicant, as being friend of one of the accused. It is pertinent to

note that she does not speak about the presence of PW-2 (Abdul

Javed Badshah Shaikh) at the time of the alleged incident.


10.   As far as PW-9 Akbar Ali Badha Shaikh is concerned, the

role attributed by him to the applicant, is identical to that of co-

                                4/6
                                                           5-IA-238-2020.doc


accused Yashir Majid Shaikh who has been released on bail by this

Court i.e. all accused persons were armed with weapons and

assaulted the deceased.


11.   Admittedly, there is no recovery of any weapons at the

instance of the applicant. It is not disputed by the learned counsel

for the respondents that the role of the applicant is similar to that

of Yashir Majid Shaikh who has been enlarged on bail. Apart from

the aforesaid evidence on record, the applicant is in custody for

the last nine years.


12.   Considering the aforesaid, application is allowed and the

applicant's sentence is suspended and he is enlarged on bail on

the following terms and conditions :


                              ORDER

(i) The applicant be enlarged on bail on furnishing P.R. Bond

in the sum of Rs.25,000/- with one or two sureties in the like

amount;

5-IA-238-2020.doc

(ii) The applicant shall report to the trial Court, once in three

months on the day/date specified by the trial Court, till the appeal

is finally disposed of;

(iii) The applicant shall keep the trial Court informed of his

current address and mobile contact number and/or change of

residence or mobile details, if any, from time to time;

(iv) If there are two consecutive defaults in appearing before the

trial Court, the learned Judge shall make a report to the High

Court and the prosecution would be at liberty to file an

application seeking cancellation of bail.

13. The Application is allowed in the aforesaid terms and is

accordingly disposed of.

All concerned to act on the authenticated copy of this order.

GAURI GODSE, J. REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

Signed by: Rajeshwari R. Pillai Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 14/09/2023 16:07:02

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter