Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 7225 Bom
Judgement Date : 19 July, 2023
KVM
1/3
10 - CRA 143 OF 2022.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 143 OF 2022
Khubi Jal Writer ..... Applicant
VERSUS
Thelma P. Cherian ..... Respondent
Mr. Vishal Kanade a/w. Ms.Priti S.Shah for the Revision Applicant.
Mr.Prosper D'souza for the Respondent.
CORAM: ABHAY AHUJA, J.
DATE : 19th JULY, 2023
P.C:-
This revision application has been preferred by the landlord
being aggrieved by the order and judgment of the Appellate Bench of
the Small Causes Court at Mumbai dated 30 th November, 2021 in
Appeal No.517 of 2016 which was filed challenging the judgment and
decree dated 25th August, 2016 of the Trial Court in RAE & R Suit No.
849/1361 of 2011 whereby the Appellate Court confirmed the order of
the Trial Court dismissing the suit filed by the landlord for eviction of
the respondent tenant.
2. Mr.Kanade, learned counsel for the revision applicant draws the
KVM
10 - CRA 143 OF 2022.doc
attention of this Court to page (191) of the application and submits that
despite admitting that the defendant did not deposit the rent amount as
claimed in the demand notice within 90 days from the service of the
suit summons upon her, the Appellate Bench has opined that this
failure on the part of the defendant could not be taken to forfeit her
tenancy right in the suit premises and inspite of the mandatory
provisions of section 15(3) of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999.
3. Learned counsel relies upon the decision of this Court in case of
Sriniwas Babulal vs. Ramakant Shivnarayan Jaiswal, 2011(2)
Bom.C.R. 370 where the Nagpur Bench of this Court considered the
provisions of section 12(3)(b) of the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging
Houses Rates Control Act, 1947 ("earlier Act") which is pari materia
(except the rate of interest) to section 15(3) of the Maharashtra Rent
Control Act, 1999 where this Court after a detailed analysis has
observed that the section 12(3) of the earlier Act is mandatory and must
be strictly complied with and Court has no discretion to treat
manifestly irregular payments as substantial compliance.
4. Mr.D'souza, learned counsel for the respondent draws attention
KVM
10 - CRA 143 OF 2022.doc
of this Court to paragraph (33) of the Trial Court order and would
submit that the notice given by the landlord had discrepancies as far as
the amount of arrears of rent was concerned and if the notice is
defective, then the claim of the landlord cannot be sustained under any
of the provisions of the Rent Control Act.
5. Having heard learned counsel and having perused the impugned
order, the following order is passed :-
(i) Admit.
(ii) Since the record and proceedings are already on
record, let the private paper-book be filed within a
period four weeks with a copy to the other side.
(iii) List for final hearing on 30th August, 2023 subject
to removal of all office objections.
[ABHAY AHUJA, J.]
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!