Wednesday, 06, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Imtiaz Sharafali Furniturewalla vs Adamji Mahomedally And 3 Ors
2023 Latest Caselaw 1742 Bom

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 1742 Bom
Judgement Date : 21 February, 2023

Bombay High Court
Imtiaz Sharafali Furniturewalla vs Adamji Mahomedally And 3 Ors on 21 February, 2023
Bench: R. I. Chagla
                                                   29-IA 1151.2020 in EXA 2128.2022.doc


K.S. Jadhav
                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                     ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

                       INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1151 OF 2020
                                         IN
                     EXECUTION APPLICATION NO.2128 OF 2022

     Imtiaz Sharafali Furniturewala                 ...Applicant/
                                                     Decree Holder
                  Versus

     Adamji Mahomedally & Ors.,                     ...Respondents/
                                                       Judgment Debtor
                                      ----------
     Mr. Rohan Savant, Counsel a/w Mr. Nishit Dhruva a/w Mr. Prakash
     Shinde a/w Ms. Niyati Merchant a/w Mr. Yash Dhruva a/w Mr. Harsh
     Sheth i/b M/s MDP & Partners, Advocates for Applicant/Decree
     Holder.
     Mr. R.M. Pardiwalla i/b Lata Kharwa, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 1
     to 3.
                                      ----------

                                      CORAM : R.I. CHAGLA J.

                                      DATE         : 21ST FEBRUARY, 2023.
     ORDER :

1. The Interim Application has been taken out in Execution

Application.

2. The matter had come up on 8th March, 2022 and this Court

had directed the Partners of M/s Darshan Group, who are the

Developers to remain present before this Court on 15 th March, 2022.

29-IA 1151.2020 in EXA 2128.2022.doc

The copy of the order was to be served on Mr. Rajendra Jain and Mr.

Mohan Jain, the Partners of M/s Darshan Group at the address

mentioned in Paragraph 1 of the said order. It was made clear that if

the said persons do not appear before this Court on the next occasion

despite notice, this Court may be constrained to issue Bailable/Non-

Bailable Warrants to secure their presence. Thereafter, the matter

came up before this Court on 15 th March, 2022, on which date, the

aforementioned Partners of M/s Darshan Group were represented by

their Advocate and they were also present in Court.

3. The learned Advocate had undertaken to file Vakalatnama on

behalf of the Partners of M/s Darshan Group within a period of one

week from the date of the order. The matter was thereafter stood

over and papers and proceeding of the abovementioned Application

was directed to be sent on the Advocates for Mr. Rajendra Jain and

Mr. Mohan Jain by the Advocates for the Applicant during the course

of the day.

4. The papers and proceedings have been served by the

Advocates for the Applicant in compliance with the order dated 15th

March, 2022. Thereafter, the matter had come up on 8 th February,

2023, on which date, the Suit was stood over today.

29-IA 1151.2020 in EXA 2128.2022.doc

5. It is noted that inspite of the orders of this Court directing Mr.

Rajendra Jain and Mr. Mohan Jain, Partners of M/s Darshan Group as

well as their Advocates to remain present before the Court, they have

remained absent.

6. Accordingly, the office shall issue notice on Mr. Rajendra Jain

and Mr. Mohan Jain for M/s Darshan Group at the address mentioned

in Paragraph 1 of the order dated 8th March, 2022 to remain present

on the next date, returnable on 14th March, 2023.

7. Mr. Rohan Savant, learned Counsel appearing for the

Applicant/Decree Holder has taken this Court through the Consent

Terms entered into between the parties and the Award passed by the

learned Arbitrator dated 26th June, 2018 in terms of the Consent

Terms. Under the Consent Terms and in particular Clause 7 thereof,

it was agreed between the parties that in the event, the Permanent

Alternate Accommodation Agreement is not executed within 12

months from the date of the Consent Terms, the Partners of the

Respondent No.1-Firm will be at liberty to find the purchaser who is

willing to buy immovable property i.e. Shop No.1, German Darshan,

First Floor, Tulsiwadi, Tardeo, Mumbai-400034 at a minimum price of

the Ready Reckoner Rate. He has stated that the Permanent

29-IA 1151.2020 in EXA 2128.2022.doc

Alternate Accommodation has not been executed till date.

8. The learned Counsel appearing for the Respondent Nos. 1, 2

and 3 has submitted that there are proceedings in the Small Causes

Court, Mumbai which have been instituted by the Respondent No.1-

Firm for declaration that the Respondent No.1-Firm is the tenant in

respect of the subject premises. The suit in the Small Causes Court

has been filed by the Respondent No.1-Firm against the Landlord and

Developer M/s Darshan Group. He has stated that there are Consent

Terms filed in that Suit, wherein M/s Darshan Group has agreed to

execute Permanent Alternate Accommodation Agreement with the

Respondent No.1-Firm. He has submitted that by virtue of the

Consent Terms and Award dated 26 th June, 2018 passed in terms

thereof, the Respondent No.1-Firm has been dissolved.

9. The learned Counsel for the Respondents has further referred

to the further Agreement/Consent Terms between the parties, in

which the parties had agreed that on the date of dissolution of the

Respondent No.1-Firm, the Partners shall be liable to pay Municipal

Taxes and all other outgoings including Society Charges in equal

proportion. The Bank Account will be operational for a period of 12

months for depositing the agreed amount which will be received from

29-IA 1151.2020 in EXA 2128.2022.doc

the customer. There is a dispute between the Partners with regard to

the operation of the Bank Account. He has also sought leave to file

Affidavit-in-sur-Rejoinder which had not been accepted by the

Registrar, though attempted to be filed. A copy of the Affidavit-in-

sur-Rejoinder has been served on the other side. The Affidavit-in-sur-

Rejoinder dated 13th December, 2021 is tendered and taken on

record.

10. At Exhibit-B of the Affidavit-in-sur-Rejoinder, there is a Notice

issued under Section 209-A dated 8th February, 2021 by the MCGM,

wherein they have called upon the occupier of the premises to pay

the outstanding property taxes amounting to Rs.1,01,97,262/- to the

MCGM upto 31st March, 2021. He has stated that an amount of

approximately Rs.67 Lakhs has been paid by the Respondent No.1-

Firm to the MCGM. He has accordingly sought direction for payment

of balance amount of Municipal Taxes and other Society outgoings

which are required to be paid by the Claimant alongwith the

Respondent Nos. 2 to 4 in equal proportion.

11. The learned Counsel for the Respondent has also tendered

letter dated 10th February, 2023 from one Deep Purple Flow

addressed to the Respondent No.1-Firm where in it is mentioned that

29-IA 1151.2020 in EXA 2128.2022.doc

inspection of the furniture and goods lying in the subject premises

had been taken and the said Deep Purple Flow is interested in buying

the entire furniture and fixtures and articles lying in the subject

premises by offering full and final consideration of Rs.1.25 Crores

inclusive of GST. The said letter dated 10 th February, 2023 is taken on

record and marked 'X' for identification.

12. Having considered that M/s Darshan Group-Developer and its

aforementioned Partners though directed by this Court to remain

present, have not remained present either by themselves or through

their Advocate, the issue of the Permanent Alternate Accommodation

Agreement shall be taken up on next date when the Partners of M/s

Darshan Group and their Advocate shall remain present.

13. By consent of the parties, the following order is passed :

(i) The furniture and goods lying in the premises are

allowed to be sold to Deep Purple Flow and the sale proceeds

deposited with the Prothonotary and Senior Master of this

Court within a period of one week from the sale.

(ii) Upon deposit of the sale proceeds the parties are

permitted to apply for withdrawal of the sale proceeds and

29-IA 1151.2020 in EXA 2128.2022.doc

thereafter, for utilization of the sale proceeds to pay property

taxes of the MCGM and outgoings of the Society which are to

be paid in equal proportion as per the Consent Terms between

parties recorded by the learned Arbitrator including payment

of GST in equal proportion by the Claimant and Respondent.

(iii) Stand over to 14th March, 2023, High on Board.

[R.I. CHAGLA J.]

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter