Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 1592 Bom
Judgement Date : 16 February, 2023
Judgment apl406.22
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY :
NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR.
CRIMINAL APPLICATION [APL] NO. 406 OF 2022.
Pravin s/o Shyamrao Tantrapale,
Aged 35 years,
Occupation - Service,
resident of Plot No.49, Dwarkapuri,
Near Nagoba Temple, Ajni,
Ngpur. ... APPLICANT.
VERSUS
1.The State of Maharashtra,
Through Police Station Officer,
Police Station Ajni,
Taluq and District Nagpur.
2.Smt. Jaymala w/o Sunil Khandekar,
Aged 50 years,
Occupation - Household,
resident of Dwarkapuri, Ring Road,
Near House of Mahendra Gajbhiye,
Nagpur. ... NON-APPLICANTS.
---------------------------------
Mr. J.K. Matale, Advocate for the Applicant.
Mr. S.A. Ashirgade, Addl.P.P. for Non-applicant No.1 /State.
Non-applicant No.2 - Served.
----------------------------------
Rgd.
Judgment apl406.22
2
CORAM : VINAY JOSHI AND
VALMIKI SA MENEZES, JJ.
DATE : FEBRUARY 16, 2023.
ORAL JUDGMENT (PER VINAY JOSHI, J.) :
Considering the controversy involved in the matter, and
by consent of the learned Counsel appearing for the respective
parties, Criminal Application is taken up for final disposal at the
stage of admission.
Admit.
2. This is an application in terms of Section 482 of the Code
of Criminal Procedure. Non-applicant No.2 has lodged a report
alleging that her son-in-law and his family members have assaulted
her, and brother of son-in-law has outraged her modesty.
3. It is submitted that during the pendency of the
proceedings, the matter has been amicably settled. Parties have
Rgd.
Judgment apl406.22
prepared consent terms to that extent.
4. Applicants family members have approached this Court in
Criminal Application No. 265/2016 seeking to quash the first
information report. In said proceeding this Court took a note about
settlement and accordingly quashed the first information report to
their extent.
5. It is informed that daughter of informant, who is wife of
the applicant is staying with the applicant happily. It was a domestic
matrimonial dispute, which has been now resolved. Looking to
the welfare of the couple, the continuation of prosecution would be
against the interest of justice. Moreover, as the matter is settled, no
purpose would be served in continuing the prosecution. Moreover
quashing of prosecution would be in the interest of saving marriage
of informants' daughter.
6. In view of above, Criminal Application is allowed and
disposed of.
Rgd.
Judgment apl406.22
7. The first information report bearing Crime No.49/2016
registered with Ajni Police Station, Nagpur for the offence
punishable under Sections 354, 325 read with Section 34 of the
Indian Penal Code is hereby quashed and set aside.
JUDGE JUDGE
Rgd.
Signed By:RAKESH GANESHLAL
DHURIYA
Private Secretary
High Court of Bombay, at Nagpur
Signing Date:20.02.2023 12:52
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!