Ayubkhan Dildarkhan Pathan And ... vs State Of Maharashtra, Through ...
2023 Latest Caselaw 1457 Bom

                                                                              caw212.2023.odt
                                             1/2



            IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                      NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.

    CIVIL APPLICATION (CAW) NO.212/2023 IN WRIT PETITION
                          NO.5354/2019 (D)
 Siddarth Yashwant Bambodakar & others -Vs.- State of Maharashtra & others

     CIVIL APPLICATION (CAW) NO.211/2023 IN WRIT PETITION
                           NO.5356/2019 (D)
   Suresh Yanbayaji Saddamwar & others -Vs.- State of Maharashtra & others

      CIVIL APPLICATION (CAW) NO.146/2023 IN WRIT PETITION
                                     NO.5355/2019 (D)
  Ayubkhan Dildarkhan Pathan & others -Vs.- State of Maharashtra & others
     -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Office notes, Office Memoranda of
Coram, appearances, Court's orders                     Court's or Judge's Orders.
or directions and Registrar's orders.
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Mr. R.R. Dawda, Advocate for the petitioners.
             Ms. S.S. Jachak, A.G.P. for respondent Nos.1 and 2.
             Ms. Kirti Satpute, Advocate for respondent No.3.              (..in all petitions)


             CORAM: SUNIL B. SHUKRE &
                    MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, JJ.

DATE : 13.2.2023

Common order Heard.

2. This application is opposed by the learned counsel for the petitioners contending that more than one years time has already been granted to respondent No.3 to comply with the judgment and order of this Court dated 27.1.2022. Therefore, he submits that no further time should be granted and if that happens the petitioners would be in a position to file contempt petition against the respondents. Learned counsel for respondent No.3 has spelt out several difficulties which are given in detail in the application.

caw212.2023.odt

3. In order to strike a balance between right of the petitioners and duty of respondent No.3, we are of the view that by way of last chance further three months time can be granted to respondent No.3.

4. List the petitions after three months.

(MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, J.) ( SUNIL B SHUKRE J.)

Signed By:NILESH VILASRAO TAMBASKAR Private Secretary Tambaskar.

Date:13.02.2023 15:35 15:32