Thursday, 07, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Vinyaka S/O Narayan Ratul vs The State Of Maharashtra Dept. Of Tribal ...
2023 Latest Caselaw 12809 Bom

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 12809 Bom
Judgement Date : 14 December, 2023

Bombay High Court

Vinyaka S/O Narayan Ratul vs The State Of Maharashtra Dept. Of Tribal ... on 14 December, 2023

Author: A.S. Chandurkar

Bench: A. S. Chandurkar

   2023:BHC-AS:38053-DB

                                                               1                            509-wp-10445-2023.doc


                                         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                                 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                                    WRIT PETITION NO.10445 OF 2023

                        Vinayak s/o Narayan Ratul
                        Age-57 years, Occ. Service
                        R/o At-Morajkarwadi, Post-Pinguli,
                        Tq. Kudal, Dist. Sindhudurg.                                     ... Petitioner
                              V/s.
                        The State of Maharashtra
                        Department of Tribal Development,
                        lMantralaya, Mumbai-32
                        Through its Secretary.

                        The Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny
                        Committee, Konkan Division, Thane,
                        Tq. & Dist. Thane.
                        Through its Member Secretary.

                        The Superintending Engineer (O& M),
                        Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution
                        Co. Ltd., Sindhudurg Circle, MIDC Area,
                        MSEDCL Campus, Kudal-416 520,
                        Tq. Kudal, Dist. Sindhudurg                            ... Respondents
                                                             -----
                        Mr. Sahil Choudhary i/b. Mr. Sushant J. Yeramwar for Petitioner.
                        Mr. N. C. Walimbe, Addl. GP a/w. Mr. R. P. Kadam, AGP for Respondent-
                        State.
                                                             -----
           Digitally
           signed by
           ASHVINI
ASHVINI    BAPPASAHEB
BAPPASAHEB KAKDE
                                                             CORAM :       A. S. CHANDURKAR &
KAKDE      Date:
           2023.12.18
           10:29:31
                                                                           FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, JJ.

+0530 DATE : 14TH DECEMBER 2023

Oral Judgment (Per A.S. Chandurkar J.):-

1. Not on board. Upon mentioning taken on board.

                        Ashvini Kakde                                                                     1 of 3





                                        2                           509-wp-10445-2023.doc


2. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard learned

Counsel for the parties.

3. The challenge raised in this Writ Petition is to the order dated

03.07.2023 passed by the Scrutiny Committee cancelling the validity

certificate that was issued to the Petitioner of belonging to Thakar Scheduled

Tribe. We find that the Scrutiny Committee on 16th December 2022 issued a

Show Cause Notice to the Petitioner calling upon him to explain as to why

the validity certificate issued to him on 30.03.2019 may not be canceled in

view of invalidation of the claims of his son, Vinayak as well as his nephew,

Rohan. It is not in dispute that the Petitioner's son Narayan has been issued a

validity certificate pursuant to the order passed by this Court in Writ Petition

13551 of 2023 (Narayan S/o Vinayak Ratul V/s. The State of Maharashtra &

Ors.) dated 16th November 2022. Such validity certificate has been issued to

Narayan on 17th November 2022. Similarly the claim of the Petitioner's blood

relative Rohan has also been upheld by the order passed in Writ Petition No.

15122 of 2022 (Rohan s/o Digambar Ratool V/s. The State of Maharashtra &

Anr.) vide order dated 4th January 2023.

4. From the aforesaid adjudication it is clear that the basis for

issuance of the show cause notice to the Petitioner does not survive. In view

of the fact that the Petitioner's son and nephew have already been issued

Ashvini Kakde 2 of 3

3 509-wp-10445-2023.doc

Validity Certificates, the order passed by the Scrutiny Committee canceling

the Petitioner's validity Certificate cannot survive. Accordingly, the order

dated 03.07.2023 passed by the Scrutiny Committee is set aside. The validity

certificate issued to the Petitioner on 30.03.2019 stands restored.

5. Rule made absolute in above terms with no order as to costs.

(FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, J.) (A. S. CHANDURKAR, J.)

Ashvini Kakde 3 of 3

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter