Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 9794 Bom
Judgement Date : 26 September, 2022
1
26-9-2022-wp-893-2022.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
Writ Petition No.893 of 2022
Rajashree Purushottam Kaslikar,
Aged 50 years, Occupation - Service
(Head Mistress),
Shri Shivaji High School,
Wanoja, Washim, District Washim. ... Petitioner
Versus
1. The Deputy Director of Education,
Amravati Division,
Amravati 444 602.
2. The Education Officer (Secondary),
Zilla Parishad, Washim 444 505.
3. The President/Secretary,
Shri Shivaji Education Society,
Amravati, District Amravti-444 603,
Office at in front of Rathi School &
Vimalabai Audatorium, Amravati. ... Respondents
Shri Y.P. Kaslikar, Advocate for Petitioner.
Shri N.S. Rao, Assistant Government Pleader for
Respondent Nos.1 and 2.
Shri Abhay Sambre, Advocate for Respondent No.3.
CORAM : SUNIL B. SHUKRE & G.A. SANAP, JJ.
DATE : 26th SEPTEMBER, 2022
ORAL JUDGMENT (PER SUNIL B. SHUKRE, J.) :
1. Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith. Heard finally by
consent of the learned counsel for the parties.
26-9-2022-wp-893-2022.odt
2. The approval to the appointment of the petitioner as
Head Mistress of Shri Shivaji High School, Wanoja, District Washim,
run by the respondent No.3-Society, has been rejected by the
respondent No.2- Education Officer (Secondary), Zilla Parishad,
Washim, by order dated 8-9-2021 only on the ground that the
no-objection by the teachers who were senior to the petitioner was not
specific in nature, in the sense that the name of the petitioner was not
stated in the letter of relinquishment of claim given by the senior
teachers and that the relinquishment letter was required to be given
within fifteen days of the arriving of the vacancy.
3. On perusal of the reply of the respondent No.3-Society and
also the other documents placed on record and even from the facts
stated in the impugned order dated 8-9-2021, it is seen that all the
requirements have been fulfilled by the petitioner and as well as the
respondent No.3-Society. The relinquishment of claim made by the
other senior teachers was more specific, in the sense that it was in
relation to the vacancy which had arisen in the year 2019. It is not in
dispute that this vacancy was filled up in the year 2019 when the
petitioner was appointed as Head Mistress of the School. The
requirement of sub-rule (3) of Rule 3 of the
Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service)
Rules, 1981 is that whenever a teacher fails to submit his willingness
26-9-2022-wp-893-2022.odt
for appointment to the post within a period of fifteen days from the
date of receipt of the communication, it is presumed that he has
relinquished his claim for appointment to the post. This is what
happened in the present case. Therefore, we find that the impugned
order rejecting the approval to the appointment to the petitioner as
Head Mistress of the School run by the respondent No.3- Society is
illegal.
4. The petition is, therefore, allowed in terms of
prayer clause (1), which reads as under :
"1. It is, therefore, humbly prayed that, the Hon'ble Court may pass appropriate order for quashing and setting aside the impugned order issued by the respondent No.2 Education Officer (Secondary) Washim dated 08-09-2021 (Annexed as Annexure P-6) by holding it unlawful, illegal and against the provisions of law."
5. We direct the respondent No.2- Education Officer to grant
approval to the appointment of the petitioner as Head Mistress of the
School run by the respondent No.3- Society within a period of two
weeks from the date of receipt of the order.
6. Rule is made absolute in the aforesaid terms. No costs.
26-9-2022-wp-893-2022.odt
(G.A. SANAP, J.) (SUNIL B. SHUKRE, J.) Lanjewar
Digitally Signed By :P D LANJEWAR Signing Date:27.09.2022 17:55
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!