Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 10839 Bom
Judgement Date : 17 October, 2022
1 of 4 03-ia-3492-22
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3492 OF 2022
IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1015 OF 2022
Ranveer Narayan Sawant ..Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ..Respondents
__________
Mr. Meghdeep Milind Oak a/w. Diptenda Bose a/w. Anirudh
Gollapudi for Appellant.
Smt. M.R. Tidke, APP for State/Respondent No.1.
__________
CORAM : SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.
DATE : 17th OCTOBER 2022
PC :
1. This is an application for bail during pendency and final
disposal of Criminal Appeal No. 1015 of 2022 preferred by the
Applicant challenging the Judgment and order dated 06/09/2022
passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Satara in Sessions
Case No.15 of 2017. The Applicant and three others were tried for
commission of offences punishable under sections 307, 323, 504
Digitally
and 506 r/w. 34 of I.P.C. All of them were acquitted from the
signed by
VINOD
VINOD BHASKAR
BHASKAR GOKHALE
GOKHALE Date:
2022.10.18
10:41:23
+0530 Gokhale
2 of 4 03-ia-3492-22
Charges of commission of offences punishable U/s.307, 323, 504
and 506 r/w. 34 of I.P.C. Except the Applicant, others were
acquitted of all the Charges. The Applicant was convicted for
commission of offence punishable U/s.324 of I.P.C. and was
sentenced to suffer R.I. for one year and to pay a fine of Rs.5000/-
and in default of payment of fine to suffer S.I. for 6 months.
2. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the
incident had occurred on the spur of moment. There was no
motive, intention or knowledge to commit this offence. Learned
Judge has rightly acquitted the applicant from Charge U/s.307 of
I.P.C. He submitted that, the applicant deserves to be acquitted on
merits. He submitted that the sentence is only of one year. The
applicant was on bail during trial and he has not misused the
same. During trial he was in custody for three months. Therefore,
out of one year he has substantially served major part of his
sentence. Even after his conviction his sentence is suspended by
learned trial Judge U/s.389 of the Cr.p.c. He, therefore, prays for
bail during pendency of his Appeal.
3 of 4 03-ia-3492-22
3. Learned APP opposed this application. She submitted
that the medical evidence shows that, it was a serious injury. Even
Doctor had described it as grievous injury and, therefore, bail
should not be granted to the applicant.
4. I have considered these submissions. Though there is
force in the submission of learned APP, this can be considered only
at the stage of final hearing. The applicant was on bail during trial.
As submitted by learned counsel for the Applicant, he has
undergone substantial portion of his sentence. He is granted bail
after his conviction U/s.389 of Cr.p.c. Therefore, the applicant can
be granted bail pending his appeal. There are no allegations that
he has misused the liberty of his bail when he was on bail during
trial.
5. Hence, the order:
ORDER
i) During pendency and final hearing of Criminal
Appeal No.1015 of 2022, the applicant is directed
to be released on bail on his furnishing P. R. bond 4 of 4 03-ia-3492-22
in the sum of Rs.30,000/- with one or two
sureties in the like amount.
ii) The Application is disposed of.
(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!