Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Rajendra Sadashiv Chandrachud vs The State Of Maharashtra And Ors
2022 Latest Caselaw 4896 Bom

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 4896 Bom
Judgement Date : 6 May, 2022

Bombay High Court
Rajendra Sadashiv Chandrachud vs The State Of Maharashtra And Ors on 6 May, 2022
Bench: N. J. Jamadar
                                                                                 501-REVN-399-2019.doc




                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                        CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
                                CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 223 OF 2017
                                                ALONGWITH
                                    CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 237 OF 2017
                                                ALONGWITH
                                    CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 399 OF 2019

         Digitally
         signed by
         SHRADDHA
                        Rajendra Sadashiv Chandrachud           ...Applicant
SHRADDHA KAMLESH
KAMLESH  TALEKAR              Vs.
TALEKAR
                        1. The State of Maharashtra
         Date:
         2022.05.06
         19:15:01
         +0530
                        & Ors.                                  ... Respondents
                                                    ****
                        Mr.Mahesh Vaswani a/w. Ms. Dharini Nagda i/b Ms. Maya Dave
                        for applicant.
                        Ms.Anamika Malhotra, APP for for respondent No.1-State.
                        Ms. Vandana Jaishingh and Ms. Archana Jaisingh for respondent
                        No.2.
                                           CORAM : N. J. JAMADAR, J.

DATE : 06th MAY, 2022 P.C.:

1. Not on Board. Mentioned. Taken on Production Board.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the applicant.

3. The learned counsel for the applicant submits that the

applicant could not deposit the sum of Rs.10,00,000/-, in terms of

the order, dated 5th April 2022.

4. On 30th March 2022, this Court had passed the following

order :

"1. Learned Counsel for the respondent No.2 states that out of the compensation amount of Rs.3,15,00,000/-, the applicant has only deposited about Rs.73,00,000/- i.e. Rs.63,00,000/- in the

Shraddha Talekar, PS 1/5 501-REVN-399-2019.doc

Appellate Court and Rs.10,00,000/- in this Court. She submits that the applicant be directed to deposit the balance amount of Rs.2,42,00,000/- in this Court.

2. Considering the fact that the trial Court has convicted the applicant under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, which Judgment and Order of conviction and sentence has been confrmed by the Appellate Court, learned Counsel for the applicant to take instructions and fle an affdavit-cum- undertaking of the applicant how the balance amount of Rs.2,42,00,000/- would be deposited in the Registry of this Court.

3. Stand over to 5th April, 2022. To be placed on the supplementary board. The applicant to remain present in Court on the next date."

5. On 5th April 2022, the applicant tendered an affdavit-cum-

undertaking to deposit Rs.10,00,000/-. After taking the affdavit-

cum-undertaking on record, the Court passed the following

order :

"2 In the said affdavit-cum-undertaking tendered today, the applicant has undertaking to deposit Rs.10,00,000/- in the Registry of this Court on or before 3rd May, 2022. In the said affdavit, the applicant has stated that he cannot deposit the entire amount as he has a good case on merits and having regard to his fnancial condition.

3. Be that as it may, after the said deposit of Rs.10,00,000/- is made, further orders will be passed with respect to deposit of the balance amount.

4. Learned Counsel for the applicant, on instructions of the applicant who is present in the Court, seeks time to fle an additional affdavit on the next date as to how the balance amount would be deposited in the Registry of this Court.

Shraddha Talekar, PS 2/5 501-REVN-399-2019.doc

5. Stand over to 5th May, 2022 for recording compliance of deposit of Rs.10,00,000/-."

6. A cumulative reading of the orders dated 30 th March 2022

and 5th April 2022 would indicate that this Court had noted that

as against the compensation of Rs.3,15,00,000/- awarded by the

Trial Court, the applicant had deposited only a sum of

Rs.73,00,000/- and, thus, the Court was anxious to know as to

how the applicant proposed to deposit the balance amount of

compensation and, therefore, the applicant was directed to fle the

affdavit.

7. On 5th April, 2022, the applicant fled an affdavit-cum-

undertaking to deposit Rs.10,00,000/- in this Court on or before

3rd May 2022. In the order dated 5 th April 2022, this Court also

noted that the applicant expressed his unwillingness to deposit

the entire amount of compensation as he had a good case on

merits and also in the context of his fnancial position.

Nonetheless, the Court recorded that after the deposit of

Rs.10,00,000/-, as undertaken, further orders would be passed

with respect to deposit of the balance amount.

8. Today, the learned counsel for the applicant submits that

the applicant is ready to deposit a sum of Rs.4,00,000/- only, and

for the deposit of the sum of Rs.6,00,000/-, time be extended till

Shraddha Talekar, PS 3/5 501-REVN-399-2019.doc

5th July 2022.

9. The aforesaid submission on behalf of the applicant does not

deserve any countenance. The circumstances in which the

applicant had undertaken to deposit the sum of Rs.10,00,000/-

cannot be lost sight of. In a sense, by order dated 5 th April 2022,

the Court had given an opportunity to the applicant to show

bonafde by making a deposit of Rs.10,00,000/-. The applicant

was further directed to fle an additional affdavit to demonstrate

as to how the balance amount would be deposited in this Court.

10. In the backdrop of the quantum of compensation yet to be

deposited, the prayer for extension of time to deposit a sum of

Rs.6,00,000/- till 5th July 2022, despite the fact that the applicant

had undertaken to make the deposit of Rs.10,00,000/- on or

before 3rd May 2022, is not worthy of acceptance.

11. This Court had, by an order dated 7 th April 2017, suspended

the substantive sentence imposed by the learned Metropolitan

Magistrate, 58th Court, Bandra, Mumbai in C.C. No.2065/SS/20,

whereby the applicant came to be convicted for the offence

punishable under section 138 read with section 141 of the

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

12. By the said judgment and order, dated 22nd June 2016, the

Shraddha Talekar, PS 4/5 501-REVN-399-2019.doc

applicant and the co-accused were sentenced to suffer Simple

Imprisonment for two months and further ordered to pay the

compensation of Rs.3,15,00,000/- alongwith interest at the rate of

9% per annum from the date of dishnour of the cheque, i.e., 7 th

February 2014.

13. The order dated 7th April 2017, suspending the substantive

sentence would, thus, stand vacated, if the applicant fails to

deposit a sum of Rs.20,00,000/- on or before 3rd June 2022.

14. The application be listed for hearing and fnal disposal on 7 th

June 2022.



                                                         (N. J. JAMADAR, J.)




Shraddha Talekar, PS                                                                      5/5
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter