Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Murlidhar S/O Ninoo Patil And ... vs State Of Maharashtra, Thr. Its ...
2022 Latest Caselaw 4849 Bom

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 4849 Bom
Judgement Date : 5 May, 2022

Bombay High Court
Murlidhar S/O Ninoo Patil And ... vs State Of Maharashtra, Thr. Its ... on 5 May, 2022
Bench: S.B. Shukre, Mukulika Shrikant Jawalkar
Judgment                              1           38-W.P.No.5412.2021.odt




           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,
                     NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.

                 WRIT PETITION NO. 5412 OF 2021


1)    Murlidhar S/o Ninoo Patil,
      Age : 71 years, Occu. - Retired,
      R/o. 12, Khedkar Nagar,
      Near Samaj Mandir, Akola - 444 001.

2)    Ganiullah Zainulla Khan,
      Age: 70 years, Occ : Retired,
      R/o. 3A, Aazad Colony,
      Behind S.T. Workshop,
      Kaulkhed, Akola.

3)    Ganesh Dadaji Sorte,
      Age: 70 years, Occ : Retired,
      R/o. Siddhi Vinayak Co-op.
      Housing Colony,
      Gorakshan Road, Akola.

4)    Waman Shamrao Pawar,
      Age: 70 years, Occ : Retired,
      R/o. 195, Pannase Layout,
      Indraprasth Nagar, Nagpur - 440022.

5)    Shankar Baxiram Dhurve,
      Age: 70 years, Occ : Retired,
      R/o. 20, Gondwana Nagar,
      Manish Nagar, Nagpur - 440037.

6)    Ramrao Yashwantrao Sonkusare,
      Age: 70 years, Occ : Retired,
      R/o. Shivalay, 4, Bhakre Layout,
      Near Papadkar Sabhagruha, Nagpur.

7)    Vasant Jijeba Kawarkhe,
      Age: 70 years, Occ : Retired,
      R/o. Kothari Vatika No.1,
      Malkapur, Dist. Akola.

8)    Dilip Manohar Lanjewar,
      Age: 69 years, Occ : Retired,
      R/o. 186, Surendra Nagar, Nagpur.
 Judgment                              2              38-W.P.No.5412.2021.odt




9)    Ramdas Punjaji Chauke (Dead)
      through Legal heirs :

      9.a) Smt. Nirmala Ramdas Chauke,
           Aged 59 years, Occ : Housewife,

      9.b) Shri Yogesh Ramdas Chauke,
           Age 40 years, Occ : Service,

      9.c)   Shri Nilesh Ramdas Chauke,
             Aged 35 years, Occ : Service,

             All 9(a) to (c) R/o. Sarode Layout,
             Bagirathi Nagar, Gudadhi, Akola,
             Tq. & Dist. Akola.

      9.d) Sau. Rajani Haridas Bagale,
           Aged : 42 years, Occ : Housewife,
           R/o. Hatekar Wadi, Mothi Umari,
           Akola, Tq. And Dist. Akola.

10)   Vijay Nilkanth Dod,
      Age: 64 years, Occ : Retired,
      R/o. Flat No.11, Rajani Apt.
      Shastri Nagar, Akola - 444001.

11)   Yadao Murlidhar Ingle,
      Age: 65 years, Occ : Retired,
      R/o. Z.P. Road, Camp Area,
      Amravati.

12)   Bhaskar Rustamrao Patil,
      Age: 65 years, Occ : Retired,
      R/o. Shahu Nagar, Khamgaon Road,
      Chikhli, Dist. Buldhana.
                                                   .... PETITIONERS

                             // VERSUS //

1)    State of Maharashtra,
      Through its Secretary,
      Department of Finance,
      Mantralaya, Mumbai-400032.
 Judgment                           3                  38-W.P.No.5412.2021.odt




2)    State of Maharashtra,
      Through its Secretary,
      Department of Agriculture,
      Mantralaya, Mumbai-400032.

3)    Dr. Panjabarao Deshmukh Krishi
      Vidyapeeth, Akola, through
      its Registrar, Akola.
                                             .... RESPONDENTS
______________________________________________________________
     Mr. A.P. Kalmegh, Advocate for the Petitioners.
     Mr. A.M. Deshpande, Additional Government Pleader for
     Respondent Nos.1 and 2.
     Mr. U.J. Deshpande, Advocate for Respondent No.3.
______________________________________________________________


                   CORAM : SUNIL B. SHUKRE AND
                           SMT. M.S. JAWALKAR, JJ.

DATED : 05.05.2022

ORAL JUDGMENT : (Per Sunil B. Shukre, J.)

1. Heard. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard finally

by consent of the learned counsel appearing for the parties.

2. Mr. A.P. Kalmegh, learned counsel for the Petitioners states

that facts of this Petition are identical to the facts of Writ Petition

No.5864 of 2019 and therefore, this Petition be allowed on similar

lines as Writ Petition No.5864 of 2019, which was decided on

2nd March, 2022.

Judgment 4 38-W.P.No.5412.2021.odt

3. Mr. A.M. Deshpande, learned Addl.G.P. appears for

Respondent Nos.1 and 2 does not dispute the aforestated position.

4. The Writ Petition is, therefore, allowed in terms of prayer

clause (II).

5. We direct the Respondent No.3 - Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh

Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola to take all necessary steps for granting

notional annual increments to the Petitioners within a period of two

months from the date of receipt of copy of the judgment.

6. The Petitioners would be entitled to receive all

consequential benefits accordingly.

Rule is made absolute in the above terms. No costs.

Authenticated copy of the judgment be furnished to all

parties.

Parties shall act upon the authenticated copy of the

judgment.

(SMT. M.S. JAWALKAR, J.) (SUNIL B. SHUKRE, J.)

Digitally Signed By:KIRTAKKirtak BHIMRAO JANARDHAN Signing Date:05.05.2022 16:29

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter