Friday, 08, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Arjun Ananda Pawar vs The State Of Maharashtra
2022 Latest Caselaw 5478 Bom

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 5478 Bom
Judgement Date : 16 June, 2022

Bombay High Court
Arjun Ananda Pawar vs The State Of Maharashtra on 16 June, 2022
Bench: R.P. Mohite-Dere, Virendrasingh Gyansingh Bisht
         Digitally
         signed by
         SHAGUFTA
SHAGUFTA Q PATHAN
Q PATHAN Date:                                                                7-IA-572-2022.doc
         2022.06.17
         17:55:37
         +0530

                            IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                   CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                 INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 572 OF 2022
                                                 IN
                                   CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 104 OF 2022


                   Arjun Ananda Pawar                          ...Applicant
                        Versus
                   The State of Maharashtra                     ...Respondent


                   Mr. Akshay Bankapur for the Applicant

                   Mr. S. S. Pednekar, A.P.P for the Respondent-State


                                              CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE &
                                                      V. G. BISHT, JJ.
                                              THURSDAY, 16th JUNE 2022

                   P.C. :


                   1            Heard learned counsel for the parties.



                   2            By this application, the applicant seeks suspension of his

                   sentence and enlargement on bail, pending the hearing and final disposal

                   of the aforesaid appeal.


       SQ Pathan                                                                            1/5
                                                                         7-IA-572-2022.doc




            3           The applicant vide judgment and order dated 25th November

            2021 passed by learned Sessions Judge, Nashik, in Sessions Case No.

            28/2017, has been convicted for the offence punishable under Section 302

            of the Indian Penal Code and is sentenced to suffer imprisonment for life

            and to pay fine of Rs.1,000/- in default, to suffer         simple rigorous

            imprisonment for three months.       In addition, the applicant has been

            convicted for the offence punishable under Section 201 of the Indian Penal

            Code and is sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for three years and

            to pay fine of Rs.500/-, in default, to suffer simple imprisonment for one

            month. Both the aforesaid sentences were directed to run concurrently.



            4            Perused the papers. The prosecution case rests entirely on

            circumstantial evidence, the circumstances being motive, last seen together

            and recovery of a wooden log at the instance of the applicant.



            5           As far as the evidence of motive is concerned, the prosecution

            has examined PW 1 - Mahadu Amruta Udar (father of the deceased) and

            PW 4 - Asha Arjun Pawar (daughter of the deceased). According to the


SQ Pathan                                                                             2/5
                                                                          7-IA-572-2022.doc


            said witnesses, the applicant would assault his wife (deceased) as he was

            suspecting her character. As far as the evidence of last seen together is

            concerned, the same is deposed to by PW 4 (daughter of the appellant and

            the deceased). A perusal of the evidence of PW 4 shows that she saw the

            applicant and her mother i.e. deceased leaving the house in the morning;

            after which, only her father returned in the evening, without the mother.

            The dead body of the deceased was found on 8th May 2017, after 3 days.



            6           As far as recovery is concerned, the wooden log is alleged to

            have been recovered at the instance of the applicant. The said wooden log

            is not blood stained.   It is not in dispute that the applicant was on bail

            pending trial. There is nothing to show that the applicant, whilst on bail,

            has abused or misused the liberty granted to him.         The appeal of the

            applicant was admitted by this Curt vide order dated 3 rd March 2022. The

            said appeal is not likely to be heard in the immediate near future.



            7            Considering the aforesaid, the application is allowed and the

            applicant's sentence is suspended and he is enlarged on bail, pending the




SQ Pathan                                                                              3/5
                                                                           7-IA-572-2022.doc


            hearing and final disposal of his appeal, on the following terms and

            conditions :-

                                             ORDER

i) The applicant be enlarged on bail on furnishing P.R. Bond in

the sum of Rs.20,000/- with one or two sureties in the like amount;

ii) The applicant shall report to the trial Court, once in three

months on the day/date specified by the trial Court, till his appeal is

finally disposed of;

iii) The applicant shall keep the trial Court informed of his

current address and mobile contact number and/or change of

residence or mobile details, if any, from time to time;

iv) If there are two consecutive defaults in appearing before the

trial Court, the learned Judge shall make a report to the High Court

and the prosecution would be at liberty to file an application seeking

cancellation of bail.

SQ Pathan                                                                               4/5
                                                                        7-IA-572-2022.doc


            8          The Application is accordingly disposed of.



            9          All concerned to act on the authenticated copy of this order.




            V. G. BISHT, J.                REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.




SQ Pathan                                                                              5/5
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter