Thursday, 14, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sapana Vikram Potdar vs The State Of Maharashtra And Anr
2022 Latest Caselaw 5152 Bom

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 5152 Bom
Judgement Date : 8 June, 2022

Bombay High Court
Sapana Vikram Potdar vs The State Of Maharashtra And Anr on 8 June, 2022
Bench: Prasanna B. Varale, N. R. Borkar
                                                                                       WP-3244-2016.odt


                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                         CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
                          WRIT PETITION NO. 3244 OF 2016
Mrs. Sapana Vikram Potdar                                         ...       Petitioner
          Versus
The State of Maharashtra and another                              ...       Respondents
                                                 .........
Mr. Balwant Salunkhe instructed by Mr. Santosh Musale for the Petitioner.
Ms. Geeta Mulekar, APP for the Respondents.
                                   .........
                                                  CORAM :         PRASANNA B. VARALE &
                                                                  N.R. BORKAR, JJ.

RESERVED ON : 24.08.2021 PRONOUNCED ON : 08.06.2022

P.C. :-

1. This Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has

been filed with the following prayers :

"(a) that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ order and/or direction in exercise of the powers vested with this Hon'ble Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, thereby calling for the investigation papers concerning FIR No.48 of 2006 registered with respondent No.2 police station for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 387, 363, 342, 328, 201, 411 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code and after examining the legality, validity and/or propriety of the same be pleased to transfer the investigation of the said case from Hinjwadi Police Station, Pune to the State CID and/or any other independent investigating agency so that the investigation shall be carried out in its true spirit.

Kanchan P Dhuri                                                                           1   / 4
                                                                                  WP-3244-2016.odt


                  (b)    any other and/or further reliefs as this Hon'ble Court may
                  deem fit and proper."


2. The aforesaid crime came to be registered as the husband of

Petitioner was found to be murdered.

3. The deceased, who was resident of Mumbai, was working as a

Software Engineer with Infosis Company at Pune. On every Friday evening he

used to come to Mumbai and used to return back to Pune on the following

Monday. On 14th March, 2006, the deceased made a phone call to the

Petitioner and informed her that he left Pune to come to Mumbai. The

deceased did not come to Mumbai within a expected time. The Petitioner tried

to contact him on his mobile phone. However, the same was out of coverage

area. The Petitioner has informed this fact to her father Mr. Arun Shroff. They

took search of the deceased and as the deceased was not found, on the next

day, i.e., 15th March, 2006, a Missing Report was lodged with Hinjwadi Police

Station. On the same day, i.e. 15th March, 2006, the Petitioner received an

information about the use of debit and credit cards of the deceased. The said

fact was communicated to the Hinjwadi Police Station. On enquiry by the

Investigating Officer, it was found that purchases were made using credit and

debit cards of the deceased from the Central-1 Mall, New Mumbai. The

credit/debit card was also used for purchasing Trump mobile recharge

Kanchan P Dhuri 2 / 4 WP-3244-2016.odt

coupons, i.e. the coupon used for recharging mobile phone of M.T.N.L.

Company. On further enquiry, it was found that with the said recharge

coupon, mobile phone No.9869331437 was recharged. Enquiry was then

made about the name of subscriber of the said mobile phone with M.T.N.L.

Accordingly M.T.N.L. communicated to the Investigating Officer, the name of

the subscriber as Kevin John Dais, resident of Dena Bank Lane, Marol Village,

Andheri (E). The Investigating Officer visited the house of said Kevin John

Dias. He took search of his house. The credit and debit cards standing in the

joint name of the deceased and present Petitioner were found at the house of

said Kevin Dias. It was found that the said credit/debit cards were used by the

brother of Kevin Dias, namely, Victor @ Vicky Julas Manthero. Pursuant to

disclosure statement of Victor Manthero the dead body of the deceased was

recovered. Crime was then registered. During investigation it was found that

said Victor @ Vicky Julias Manthero used to ply tourist vehicle on hire

between Pune and Mumbai. On the day of incident the said Victor @ Vicky

Julias Manthero and his brother Kevin, who during the course of investigation

was found to be juvenile, picked up the deceased from Pune Mumbai Highway.

It is alleged that on the way to Mumbai, they offered cold drink to the

deceased by adding sedative drug i.e. Tranquiliser Lorazepam and when the

deceased was under the influence of the said sedatives, they robbed the

Kanchan P Dhuri 3 / 4 WP-3244-2016.odt

deceased of his valuables and then threw him out of their car near Jitgaon,

Taluka : Pen, District : Raigad. It is alleged that the deceased died due to

cardio respiratory arrest due to Lorazepam poisoning.

4. Admittedly, the alleged incident took place on 14 th March, 2006.

On 23rd June, 2006 the charge-sheet was filed against Victor @ Vicky Julias

Manthero. The Sessions Court at Pune thereafter conducted the trial against

Victor @ Vicky Julais Manthero and convicted him by Judgment and Order

dated 16th August, 2010. The present Writ Petition thereafter came to be filed

on 9th September, 2016, i.e., after six years of conclusion of trial with an

allegation that no proper investigation was carried out. As at the time of filing

of present Petition the Appeal filed by the accused against his conviction was

pending, this Court on 15th October, 2016 passed the following order :

"Petition be tagged with Criminal Appeal No.668 of 2010."

5. Today by separate Judgment we have dismissed the Appeal filed

by the accused Victor Manthero. Considering the overall facts and

circumstances, we are not inclined to entertain the present Writ Petition. The

Petition is dismissed.

                              ( N.R. BORKAR, J. )                                        ( PRASANNA B. VARALE, J. )
           Digitally signed
           by KANCHAN
KANCHAN    PRASHANT
           DHURI
PRASHANT   Date:
DHURI      2022.06.08
           17:02:24
           +0530




                              Kanchan P Dhuri                                                                  4   / 4
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter