Jitendras Auto World vs Union Of India And 3 Ors
2022 Latest Caselaw 1751 Bom

                       bdp
                                                            1
                                                                                   14-wp-1119.19.doc

           Digitally signed
           by BIPIN             IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
           DHARMENDER
BIPIN
DHARMENDER
PRITHIANI
           PRITHIANI
           Date:
                                   ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
           2022.02.22
           15:35:27
           +0530

                                          WRIT PETITION NO. 1119 OF 2019

                       Jitendras Auto World                                    ... Petitioner
                             Versus
                       Union of India and Ors.                                 ... Respondents

                                                     ******
                       Mr. Abhishek A. Rastogi a/w Ms. Rashmi Deshpandey, Pratyushprava
                       Saha, Mahir Chablani, Kanika Sharma i/by M/s. Khaitan & Co. for the
                       Petitioner.
                       Mr. Pradeep S. Jetly, Senior Advocate a/w Mr. Jitendra B. Mishra,
                       Mr.Ashutosh Mishra, Ms. Sangeeta Yadav for the Respondent Nos.1, 3
                       and 4.
                       Mr. Himanshu Takke, AGP for the State-Respondent No.2.
                                                     ******
                                                          CORAM: R. D. DHANUKA AND
                                                                 S. M. MODAK, JJ.

                                                          DATE      : 21st FEBRUARY, 2022

                       P.C. :-

                       .         Place the matter on board at 2:30 p.m on 17 th March, 2022 for

hearing and final disposal of the matter at the admission stage.

2. Both the parties are permitted to file brief written arguments along with copy of the judgment on which they propose to rely upon in support of their rival contentions, with advance copy to be served on the other side.

                              [S. M. MODAK, J.]                        [R. D. DHANUKA, J.]