Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 12864 Bom
Judgement Date : 12 December, 2022
1 421.FA.845-2019 JUDGMENT.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
FIRST APPEAL NO. 845 OF 2019
Bhaurao Champat Shende
Age 65 Yrs., Occ. Agriculture,
R/o. Ghuikhed,
Tq. Chandur Rly, District Amravati. APPELLANT
Versus
1. The State of Maharashtra,
Through the Collector, Camp,
Amravati.
2. Special Land Acquisition Officer,
Upper Wardha Project No.4, Amravati
Collector's Compound, Amravati,
Tq. & Dist. Amravati.
3. The Executive Engineer,
Bembla Project Division, Yeotmal,
Tq. & District Yeotmal. RESPONDENTS
----------------------------------------------
Mr. N.S. Bhelkar, Advocate for the Appellant.
Ms. M.H. Deshmukh, AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 & 2.
Mr. M.A. Kadu, Advocate for Respondent No.3.
-----------------------------------------------
CORAM : AVINASH G. GHAROTE, J.
DATED : 12th DECEMBER, 2022.
ORAL JUDGMENT :-
2 421.FA.845-2019 JUDGMENT.odt
Heard Mr. Bhelkar, learned Counsel for the
appellant, Ms. Deshmukh, learned AGP for the respondent
Nos.1 and 2/State and Mr. Kadu, learned Counsel for the
respondent No.3.
2. The factual position in the present appeal is as
under -
BEMBLA RIVER PROJECT, DISTRICT YAVATMAL
DATE OF NOTIFICATION U/S 4 OF THE LAC ACT 18.08.2005
Village: Ghuikhed Tahsil Chandur Railway District : Amravati Property Area of LAO Award Dated Ref. Court Award details property 06.09.2008 Dated 16.11.2016
Plot Plot Area : Rs.140/- per Sq.mt Rs.500/- per No:221/2 54 Sq.mtr. Sq.mtr.
Construction: Rs. 18,776/- Rs. 25,347/- 54 Sq.mtr.
Plot No. Plot Area. 68 Rs. 140/- Sq.mtr. Rs. 500/- per
263/3 Sq.mtr. Sq.mtr.
Construction: Rs.66,042/- Rs.89,157/-
52.29
Sq.mtr.
Rs. 18,776/- Rs. 25,347/-
Rs. 66,042/- Rs.89,157/-
Total Rs. 84818/- Total Rs.1,14,504/-
lumpsum amount lumpsum amount 3. The appeal challenges the judgment of the
Reference Court dated 16.11.2016, whereby the learned 3 421.FA.845-2019 JUDGMENT.odt
Reference Court has enhanced the compensation for the open
plot Nos. 221/2 and 263/3 to Rs.500/-per sq.mtr., and has
granted lumpsum amount of Rs. 1,14,504/- compensation for
the constructed area in respect of plot Nos. 221/2 and 263/3 as
detailed above.
4. In First Appeal No. 1378/2018 (Sharad Gangadhar
Gulhane Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors.) and First Appeal No.
389 of 2018 (Lilabai Omkarrao Giri and others Vs. State of
Maharashtra & Ors.) decided on 06.09.2021, this Court, while
considering the claim for enhancement of compensation in
respect of plots at Village Ghuikhed had decided the
compensation to Rs.575/- per sq.mtr. The fixing of the said rate,
of open plot, was based upon the fact that the said Village is
located on the border of the State Highway i.e. Aurangabad -
Nagpur Highway, about half kilometer from the highway, from
there is an approach road to the Village and considering the sale
deed dated 30.03.1995 of the same village, the compensation
was enhanced considering the escalation / increase per year for
a period of 10 and half years and the aforesaid rate of Rs.575/-
per sq.mtr. for open plot has been fixed.
4 421.FA.845-2019 JUDGMENT.odt
5. In the instant matter, no material, has been brought
to my notice existing on record, for me to take a different view
than what has been already taken by this court in First Appeal
No. 1378/2018 (Sharad Gangadhar Gulhane Vs. State of
Maharashtra & Ors.) (Supra).
6. The evidence of PW-2 Chandrashekhar Wankhade at
Exh.37 the valuer, who claims the market rate to be Rs.1,000/-
per sq.mtr. for open plot, would demonstrate, that he has not
inquired about any sale instance, from the same Village or from
the neighboring Village, in order to arrive at the rate as been
quoted in his reports at Exh. 38 and 41. He further, admits in his
cross-examination that for the purpose of determining the value
of the plot, the value of the neighboring properties, has to be
ascertained, which has not been done by him, neither he has
inquired from the Gram Panchayat, when the construction has
been made, apart from which, there is nothing in his report or
on record to indicate the nature of the construction. However,
the rate awarded by the learned Reference Court cannot be
interfered with, though it appears to be on the higher side, as
there is no cross appeal by the acquiring body regarding the rate 5 421.FA.845-2019 JUDGMENT.odt
of construction as awarded by the learned Reference Court.
7. That being the position, in view of the rate of open
plot for Village Ghuikhed, having already being determined by
this Court at Rs.575/- per sq.mtr., the appellant, would only be
entitled to that benefit and nothing else.
8. In the result, the appeal is partly allowed and the
impugned judgment under reference is modified by enhancing
the rate of open plot as granted by the learned Reference Court
at Rs.500/- per sq.mtr. to Rs.575/- per sq.mtr, as held in Sharad
Gangadhar Gulhane (supra). Rest of the judgment of the
learned Reference Court is maintained.
9. The difference in the amount of compensation and
all ancillary benefits arising therefrom as per the provisions of
the Land Acquisition Act, as applicable thereto be calculated
and deposited in the Reference Court within a period of eight
weeks from today. The difference in court fees, if any, shall also
be deposited by the appellant with this Court within eight
weeks.
6 421.FA.845-2019 JUDGMENT.odt
10. The First Appeal is partly allowed in the above
terms. No costs.
11. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of
accordingly.
( AVINASH G. GHAROTE, J.)
S.D.Bhimte
Signed By:SHRIKANT DAMODHAR BHIMTE
Signing Date:14.12.2022 17:42
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!