Wednesday, 06, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Chandpasha Mashyak Jamadar vs The State Of Maharashtra And ...
2021 Latest Caselaw 13245 Bom

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 13245 Bom
Judgement Date : 16 September, 2021

Bombay High Court
Chandpasha Mashyak Jamadar vs The State Of Maharashtra And ... on 16 September, 2021
Bench: S.V. Gangapurwala, R. N. Laddha
                                     1              983-wp 10228-2021.odt



               IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                          BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                         WRIT PETITION NO. 10228 OF 2021

 Chandpasha Mashyak Jamadar                                      .. Petitioner

          Versus

 The State of Maharashtra and others                             .. Respondents

 Mr. Pravin B. Rakhunde, Advocate for the Petitioner.
 Mr. P. K. Lakhotiya, AGP for Respondents/State.

                               CORAM :   S. V. GANGAPURWALA &
                                         R. N. LADDHA, JJ.

DATED : 16th September, 2021.

PER COURT:-

. Mr. Rakhunde, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

petitioner has filed an application under Section 28-A of the Land

Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as 'Act of 1894').

However, the said application is rejected only on the ground that,

appeal is filed by the State / acquiring body and the same is pending.

Stay is granted.

2. We have also heard the learned A.G.P. for respondents.

3. If the acquiring body / State has filed an appeal before this Court

and stay has been granted to the judgment of the Reference Court, then

certainly, the SLAO could not have decided the application under

1 of 2

2 983-wp 10228-2021.odt

Section 28-A of the Act of 1894. To that extent, the SLAO is justified,

however, the SLAO could not have been rejected the application under

Section 28-A of the Act of 1894. It should have kept it pending.

4. In view of that, the order to the extent rejecting the application

of the petitioner is set aside. The SLAO shall keep the said application

pending and decide it after the appeal is decided by this Court and / or

stay is vacated.

5. With these observations, writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

 ( R. N. LADDHA )                               ( S. V. GANGAPURWALA )
      JUDGE                                               JUDGE




 P.S.B.




                                                                               2 of 2





 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter