Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 12821 Bom
Judgement Date : 7 September, 2021
(1)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
941 SECOND APPEAL NO.550 OF 2013
RAJANNA RAJANA (BK) KASLOD
VERSUS
RAJANNA RAJANA (KD) KASLOD AND OTHERS
...
Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Bilolikar Upendra B.
Mr. Bhavthankar Vivek Vasantrao, Adv. For R/2
-----
CORAM : SMT.VIBHA KANKANWADI,J.
DATE : 7th September, 2021. PER COURT :-
1. Learned Advocate for the appellant submits that
he has instructions to say that the appellant has expired and
he also submits that the appellant is survived by a widow,
who does not want to approach this Court.
2. Another hurdle in this case as regards
proceeding with the matter is concerned, the appeal came
to be abated against Respondent No.1 and order to that
effect has been passed by this Court on 19.12.2013. There
was no attempt to get that order set aside and bring legal
representatives of deceased Respondent No.1 on record.
3. The suit was for partition and separate
possession and it was decreed. However, original deft.No.2
filed the appeal. The appeal came to be allowed and the
judgment and decree passed by the Trial court has been set
aside. Now, this Court cannot reverse that decree in
absence of the legal heirs of Respondent No.1. Therefore, in
view of the decisions in the case of State of Punjab Vs.
Nathuram - AIR 1962 SC 89, and Bibijan and Ors. Vs.
Murlidhar and Ors. - (1995) 1 SCC 187, the entire appeal
shall fail.
4. The Second Appeal stands disposed of. Pending
civil application, if any, also stands disposed of.
(SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI) JUDGE
BDV
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!