Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 12477 Bom
Judgement Date : 2 September, 2021
Megha 26_IA_1038_2021 in apeal_278_2021.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
MEGHA
S
Digitally signed
by MEGHA S
PARAB
Date:
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1038 OF 2021
IN
2021.09.03
PARAB 10:34:48
+0530
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.278 OF 2021
Bhavesh Amrutlal Varu ...Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ...Respondents
....
Mr. Manas Gawankar for the Applicant.
Mr. P.H. Gaikwad, APP for Respondent No.1-State.
Ms Amita Kuttikrishnan for Respondent No.2.
CORAM : SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.
DATED: 2nd SEPTEMBER, 2021.
P.C.:-
This is an application under Section 389 of the Code of
Criminal Procedure, 1973 for suspension of substantive order of
sentence imposed by judgment dated 08/02/2021 passed by learned
Extra Joint District Judge and Additional Sessions Judge, Ratnagiri, in
Special Sessions Case No.16 of 2019 and to enlarge the Applicant on
bail.
2. By the impugned judgment the Applicant has been held
guilty of ofence punishable under Section 10 of the Protection of
Children from Sexual Ofences Act, 2012 (POCSO) and sentenced him to
Megha 26_IA_1038_2021 in apeal_278_2021.doc
sufer rigorous imprisonment for 5 years and to pay fne of Rs.5000/-
i/d. to sufer simple imprisonment for six months. The Applicant has
challenged his conviction and sentence in appeal under Section 374 of
the Cr.P.C. and sought suspension of sentence pending hearing of the
Appeal.
3. Perused the records and considered the submissions
advanced by Mr. Manas Gawankar, learned counsel for the Applicant,
Mr. P.H. Gaikwad, learned APP for Respondent No.1-State and Ms Amita
Kuttikrishnan, learned counsel for Respondent No.2.
4. The maximum sentence imposed against the Applicant is of
5 years. There are several old matters pending before the Court.
Moreover, considering the present situation arising due to Covid-19
pandemic, it will not be possible to take up the appeal for fnal hearing
in immediate future. The sentence imposed is a short term
imprisonment. Considering the said fact and also considering the
nature of accusations, in my considered view this is a ft case to suspend
the substantive order of sentence pending disposal of the appeal.
Hence, the application is allowed on following terms and conditions:-
(i) The substantive order of sentence imposed vide
judgment dated 08/02/2021 in Special Sessions Case
Megha 26_IA_1038_2021 in apeal_278_2021.doc
No.16 of 2019 is suspended pending disposal of the
appeal.
(ii) The Applicant be released on provisional cash bail in the
sum of Rs.10,000/- for a period of four weeks;
(iii) The Applicant shall within the said period of four weeks,
furnish PR bonds in the sum of Rs.10,000/- with one or
two sureties in the like amount;
(iv) The Applicant shall report to the Trial Court, once in six
months on the day/date specifed by the Trial Court, till
the appeal is fnally disposed of;
(v) The Applicant shall keep the Trial Court informed of his
current address and mobile contact numbers and/or
change of residence or mobile details, if any, from time
to time;
(vi) If there are two consecutive defaults in appearing
before the Trial Court, the learned Judge shall make a
report to the High Court and the prosecution would be
at liberty to fle an application seeking cancellation of
bail.
5. The application stands disposed of in above terms.
(SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!