Friday, 01, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Purushotaam Badrinath Chandak vs Savitribai Badrinarayan Chandak ...
2021 Latest Caselaw 15664 Bom

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 15664 Bom
Judgement Date : 29 October, 2021

Bombay High Court
Purushotaam Badrinath Chandak vs Savitribai Badrinarayan Chandak ... on 29 October, 2021
Bench: Bharati Dangre
             Digitally signed by
JAYARAJAN    JAYARAJAN
ANJAKULATH   ANJAKULATH NAIR
NAIR         Date: 2021.10.29
             18:58:13 +0530




                                                               1/3                  21 WP-7390.21.odt


                                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                                 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
                                                 WRIT PETITION NO.7390 OF 2021


                                   Purushottaam Badrinath Chandak           ..            Petitioner

                                           Vs.

                                   Savitribai Bdrinarayan Chandak
                                   (Since deceased) Through LRs. & Ors. ..               Respondents

                                                               ...
                                   Dr. Uday P. Warunjikar with Ms. Vaishnavi Gujarathi for the
                                   petitioner.

                                   Mr. Ajay A. Joshi for respondent No.3.
                                                                  ...

                                                      CORAM : SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J.
                                                      DATED      : 29TH OCTOBER, 2021.

                                   P.C:-

1. Heard Mr. Warunjikar, learned counsel for the petitioner (judgment debtor No.3) and learned counsel for respondent No.3 (decree holder).

2. My attention is invited to the order dated 09/09/2021, wherein learned Judge has recorded the willingness of judgment debtor No.2, who had moved an application to purchase the suit property for consideration of Rs.1 crore, which includes his 1/4th

AJN 2/3 21 WP-7390.21.odt

share. The present petitioner opposed the application and requested the court to appoint a valuer. This request is turned down on the ground that the appointment of valuer as ought is made with an oblique motive to delay the execution proceedings.

3. Pertinent to note that the suit filed by respondent No.3 before the court is decreed on 11/07/1997 and the plaintiff and defendant Nos.1 to 3 are held entitled to 1/4th share. The question before the executing court is as to how the decree can be executed.

4. On an application vide Ex-92, when judgment debtor No.2 gave an offer to purchase the entire property for Rs.1 crore, learned Judge, Small Causes Court, Pune, by his order dated 09/09/2021 permitted the judgment debtor to deposit the sale consideration of Rs.75 lakhs excluding his 1/4th share. He also ordered that on depositing the said amount, judgment debtor No.3 shall execute sale deed in his favour and, if there is a refusal to execute the sale deed, the court officer shall execute the sale deed in favour of judgment debtor No.2. My attention is invited to the order dated 23/10/2021 by which the learned Judge has accepted the draft of the proposed sale deed at the instance of judgment debtor No.2 and it has appointed Nazir to execute the sale deed. The next date is scheduled for 08/11/2021.


AJN
                               3/3                  21 WP-7390.21.odt


5. On perusal of the proceedings, which are placed before me, the moot question which arises is who has determined the valuation of the property at Rs.1 crore and, if at all, the offer of judgment debtor No.2 is to be accepted, it can only be done after assessing the valuation of the property and particularly when the judgment debtor No.3 has made an offer of Rs.1.05 crore. In any case, before accepting the offer of any of the parties, it would be necessary to obtain a report of the valuation so that the value of the property can be assessed. This is not the manner in which, a decree can be executed and the objection is rejected on the ground that it will delay the execution of the decree. In such circumstances, I deem it appropriate to grant stay of the impugned order dated 09/09/2021 as well as the further order dated 23/10/2021 which is brought on record in the additional affidavit.

6. Issue notice to respondent Nos.1(a) to 1(c) and respondent No.2. Notice is made returnable on 30/11/2021. The petitioner is also permitted to serve the respondents by private notice.

7. All concerned to act on the authenticated copy of the order.

[SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J.]

AJN

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter