Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 14391 Bom
Judgement Date : 4 October, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
[ COMMERCIAL DIVISION ]
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.467 OF 2021
ALONG WITH
CONTEMPT PETITION (LODGING) NO.21680 OF 2021
IN
COMMERCIAL EXECUTION APPLICATION NO.1729 OF 2018
ALONG WITH
CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.79 OF 2019
Manish K. Ajmera and Anr. .. Applicants-Claimants
Vs.
Ketan T. Shah and Anr. .. Respondents-Judg. Debtors
And
Vijay Kamal Properties Pvt. Ltd. .. Respondent
ALONG WITH
CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.3 OF 2021
IN
COMMERCIAL EXECUTION APPLICATION NO.1729 OF 2018
Manish K. Ajmera and Anr. .. Applicants-Claimants
Vs.
Ketan T. Shah .. Respondent-Judg. Debtor
And
Vijay Kamal Properties Pvt. Ltd. and Ors. .. Respondents
And
The Collector and Ors. .. Proposed Respondents
Mr. Sanjay Jain, with Mr. Anosh Sequeira, Mr. Naresh Chheda and Ms. Sakina
Electricwala, i/by Taurus Legal, for the Applicants-Claimants-Award Holders.
Mr. Rajiv Narula, i/by Jhangiani Narula & Associates, for the Respondents-
Judgment Debtors.
Mrs. Kanchan Rane, 1st Assistant to Court Receiver, is present.
1/3
4-IA-467-2021.doc
Dixit
CORAM : A. K. MENON, J.
DATE : 4TH OCTOBER, 2021. P.C. :
1. By this IA, the applicants-award holders inter alia seek mandatory
injunctions to disclose on oath all assets of a judgment-debtor and for
handing over all sanctions, applications, records and sanction plans
pertaining to two wings of a building known as "Gaurav Discovery" described
in Schedule-1, annexed at Exhibit-A to the IA. Injunctions are also sought to
restrain the judgment-debtor and respondent no.1.
2. The learned counsel for the respondents seeks to oppose the application
on the basis that pursuant to an order passed on 26 th July 2021 in Interim
Application No.467 of 2021, Court Receiver has already been appointed of
several flats. Public notices have been issued and that order has now been
complied with.
3. Mr. Narula further states that the order of 26 th July 2021 protects the
judgment-creditors. In addition, Mr. Narula seeks to make reference to the
affidavit-in-reply, in which he states that he has pointed out that there are
several facts which are suppressed. Unfortunately, the reply has not been filed
on record, although the rejoinder is in place. That is an aspect to be
considered after the reply is filed.
4-IA-467-2021.doc Dixit
4. Receiver confirms that the order dated 26 th July 2021 has been partly
complied. There is a grievance made by Mr. Jain that copies of the documents
furnished to the Receiver contains several documents which are not legible.
According to Mr. Narula, these are the only documents that he has been
provided with by the Municipal Corporation and other authorities. Receiver
shall accordingly take up the issue with the Municipal Corporation and seek
legible and certified copies of those documents. Let this be done before the
next date.
5. In the meantime, there is no occasion to refuse relief in terms of prayer
clause (a) since admittedly the decree has not been satisfied, nor is the
respondent-judgment debtor willing to deposit the decretal sum in court.
Accordingly, I pass the following order :-
(i) There will be an order in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (c) of the IA.
(ii) Disclosure affidavit to be filed on or before 25 th October 2021.
(iii) List the IA on 26th October 2021, along with Contempt Petition (Lodging) No.21680 of 2021, Chamber Summons Nos.3 of 2021 and 79 of 2019.
(iv) In the meantime, Receiver to obtain legible and certified copies of the documents, as stated above, from the Municipal Corporation and other concerned authorities.
(A.K. MENON, J.)
Digitally signed SNEHA by SNEHA ABHAY DIXIT 4-IA-467-2021.doc ABHAY Date:
DIXIT 2021.10.04 17:20:09 +0530 Dixit
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!