Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Azeez Unni Mohammed @ Ajju Rolex vs The State Of Maharashtra
2021 Latest Caselaw 16498 Bom

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 16498 Bom
Judgement Date : 29 November, 2021

Bombay High Court
Azeez Unni Mohammed @ Ajju Rolex vs The State Of Maharashtra on 29 November, 2021
Bench: Nitin W. Sambre
                                                          38.3539.21 ba.doc

ISM
                IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                      CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
                  CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 3539 OF 2021

      AZEEZ UNNI MOHAMMED @ AJJU ROLEX                    ....APPLICANT

              V/s.

      THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA                      .....RESPONDENT

      Mr. Nitin Sejpal a/w Akshata Desai for the applicant
      Mr. Ajay Patil APP for the State


                        CORAM :     NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.
                        DATE:       NOVEMBER 29, 2021.

      P.C.:

      1]      Heard.




      2]      On merit, prayer for grant of bail was rejected on 28/12/2019.

The attempt on the part of the applicant seeking bail thereafter before

Apex Court was also resulted in failure as Apex Court has also

rejected the prayer for grant of bail.

3] Present application is moved seeking bail on the medical

38.3539.21 ba.doc

grounds. My attention is invited to the fact that applicant is suffering

from Chronic Renal disease, Hypertension and Deep Venous

Thrombosis. It is claimed that applicant is surviving on one kidney

which is functioning at at its 20% of the capacity and as such,

applicant is more prone to infection. Counsel for the applicant by

relying on Division Bench Judgment of this Court in the matter of Dr.

P. V. Varavara Rao Vs. National Investigation Agency & Anr [2021 ALL

MR (Cri) 1955] would urge that even a prisoner have right to get

proper medical treatment. As such, claim is, he is entitled to be

released for taking treatment.

4] Learned counsel for the applicant would urge that applicant be

released temporarily, medical report be called and then Court may

decide further action in the matter as to whether he should be

continued on temporary medical bail.

5] Learned APP based on report of the Chief Medical Officer,

Mumbai, Central Prison, Mumbai would oppose the prayer.

38.3539.21 ba.doc

6] Considered submissions.

7] The fact that applicant is suffering from Chronic Renal disease

is not in dispute. However, during the course of hearing of the

application, in the backdrop of the medical report, in response to

Court's query, learned counsel for the applicant Mr. Sejpal would

urge that the solution available to the issue is that of Renal

transplant and for that purpose a donor has to be arranged for which

his release is necessary.

8] Learned counsel for the applicant so as to substantiate his

aforesaid contentions has placed on record affidavit of younger

brother of the applicant thereby producing on record medical

certificate issued by Dr. Jatin Kothari who is administering

treatment to the applicant.

9] As far as aforesaid contentions are concerned, it is not in

dispute that the solution available to the medical problem of the

38.3539.21 ba.doc

applicant is Renal transplant. For that purpose, either he has to have

a donor from his family or can take recourse to swapping. Applicant

has not come out with any such case before the Court to claim that

any of his blood relative is willing to donate kidney or otherwise also

ready for swapping. As such, only purpose for which applicant is

seeking his release is, to avoid he being getting infected as his

immune system is not supportive. The jail authorities as is reflected

in the report submitted before this Court of having taken appropriate

steps in the matter thereby admitting him to the jail hospital and he

is provided with home food containing low salt and protein. Apart

from above, appropriate treatment is provided and there is no

complaint about the same brought on record.

10] As such, what can be noticed is, applicant is seeking his release

under the pretext that his one kidney has already failed whereas

other kidney is functioning at 20% of the capacity. None of his blood

relatives have come out in his support that they are willing to donate

kidney or willing to swap the same. There is enough material to infer

that applicant is provided proper treatment in the jail. Apart from

38.3539.21 ba.doc

above, this Court is sensitive to the fact that after his unsuccessful

attempt of release on 28/12/2019 before this Court, the Apex Court

also turned down his plea recently in 2020.

11] That being so, no case for grant of temporary bail is made out.

As such, application stands rejected.

12] However, it is worth to mention that in case if the applicant

comes out with a case of Renal transplant, either through his

donor/(blood relative) or swapping, same shall be considered on its

own merits by the jail authorities in accordance with law.

13] Considering the medical condition of the applicant, hearing of

the trial is expedited. Trial Court is requested to submit progress

report of the trial after every three months.

[NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.] IRESH SIDDHARAM MASHAL

Digitally signed by IRESH SIDDHARAM MASHAL Date: 2021.11.30 10:37:56 +0530

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter