Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 16430 Bom
Judgement Date : 26 November, 2021
pps 8-ii-ia-2685-21.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 2685 OF 2021
IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 909 OF 2021
Arvind Baburao Deshpande ..Appellant
v/s.
The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent/s
Ms. Rati S. Sinhasane for the Appellant.
Mr. P.H.Gaikwad, APP for the Respondent-State.
CORAM : SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.
DATED : 26th NOVEMBER, 2021.
P.C.
1. At the outset, learned Counsel for the Applicant seeks leave
to amend the prayer clauses (a) and (b) of the Application
wherein the words 'Criminal Appeal' have been wrongly typed
instead of 'Special (ACB) Case' . Leave granted. Amendment to
be carried out forthwith.
2. By this application under Section 389 of Cr.P.C., the
Applicant has sought suspension of substantive sentence imposed
vide judgment and order dated 27.09.2021 in Special (ACB) Case
No. 3 of2010. By the impugned judgment the Applicant who was
1 of 4 pps 8-ii-ia-2685-21.doc
accused No.1 in Special Case No. 3 of 2010 has been held guilty of
offence under Section 13(1)(e) r/w. 13(2) of Prevention of
Corruption Act, and he has been sentenced to undergo rigorous
imprisonment for 2 years with fine of Rs.50,000/- i.d. to undergo
simple imprisonment for two months.
3. Heard the learned Counsel for the Applicant and the learned
APP for the State. Perused the record and considered the
submissions advanced by the learned Counsels for the respective
parties.
4. The learned Counsel for the Applicant states that the
Applicant has already deposited the fine amount before the Special
Court. She further states that by order dated 27.09.2021 the
Special Court had suspended the sentence till filing of the appeal.
The sentence imposed against the Applicant is short term
imprisonment. Appeal is already admitted. Considering the large
pendency of old cases as well as the present situation arising from
COVID-19 pandemic, it would not be possible to hear the appeal in
immediate future.
2 of 4
pps 8-ii-ia-2685-21.doc
5. The applicant was on bail during pendency of the trial and
he has not misused the liberty. Considering the above facts, in my
considered view, this is a fit case to suspend the sentence pending
the disposal of the appeal. Hence the application is allowed on
the following terms and conditions:
i) Substantive sentence imposed against the Applicant by
judgment dated 27.09.2021 in Special (ACB) Case No.3 of 2010 is
suspended pending hearing of the appeal;
ii) The Applicant is ordered to be released on bail on furnishing
P.R. Bond in the sum of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand
Only) with one or two solvent sureties in the like amount, to the
satisfaction of the Trial Court;
Iii) The Applicant shall report to the Trial Court once in two
months on the day/ date specified by the Trial Court, till the
Appeal is finally disposed of;
(iv) The applicant shall keep the trial Court informed of his
current address and mobile/contact numbers and/or change of
residence or mobile details, if any, from time to time.
v) If there are two consecutive defaults in appearing before the
3 of 4
pps 8-ii-ia-2685-21.doc
trial Court, the learned Judge shall make a report to the High
Court and the prosecution would be at liberty to file application
seeking cancellation of bail.
. Application is accordingly disposed of.
Digitally signed by PRASANNA P PRASANNA P SALGAONKAR SALGAONKAR Date:
2021.11.26 19:28:34 (ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.) +0530
4 of 4
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!