Wednesday, 06, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Narendra B. Mantri vs Valjibhai H. Patel And Purshottam ...
2021 Latest Caselaw 16117 Bom

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 16117 Bom
Judgement Date : 22 November, 2021

Bombay High Court
Narendra B. Mantri vs Valjibhai H. Patel And Purshottam ... on 22 November, 2021
Bench: A. K. Menon
              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                     ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

                       INTERIM APPLICATION NO.460 OF 2019
                                        IN
                     EXECUTION APPLICATION NO.1592 OF 2015

CFM Asset Reconstruction Pvt. Ltd.                     .. Applicant
In the matter between
L & T Finance Ltd.                                     .. Claimant-Decree Holder
       Vs.
Dhirendra Pradhan and Anr.                             .. Respondents-Judg. Debtors


Ms. Shraddha Patil, i/by D.S. Law, for the Applicant/Claimant.
None for the Respondents-Judgment Debtors.

                                          CORAM : A. K. MENON, J.
                                          DATE     : 22ND NOVEMBER, 2021.
P.C. :

1. On behalf of the applicant, learned counsel submits that there has been

a change of Advocate. She states that she intends to enter appearance in place

of the existing Advocates, who have entered appearance in the Execution

Application. The current Advocate in the Execution Application is also

represented. She has endorsed her no objection on the vakalatnama in the IA.

Accordingly, vakalatnama shall be filed in the registry on or before 26 th

November 2021. This appearance shall be treated as appearance in the

Execution Application as well. No separate vakalatnama needs to be filed in

the Execution Application.

2. The IA seeks substitution of the applicant-CFM Asset Reconstruction

39-IA-460-2019.doc Dixit Pvt. Ltd. since the original claimant-L & T Finance Ltd. has assigned debt to the

present applicant. The respondents-judgment debtors are not represented

today. It appears that they have not been served with this IA. However, since

this IA is only for substitution of the applicant by virtue of a Deed of

Assignment dated 26th June 2019, a fact that is admitted by the original

claimant-decree holder, I am of the view that this application is liable to be

allowed.

3. Accordingly, I pass the following order :-

(i) Subject to filing vakalatnama on behalf of the applicant, as directed, IA is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a),

(b) and (c).

(ii) Amendment to be carried out within four weeks from today.

(iii) If vakalatnama is not filed or the amendment is not carried out within the stipulated period, Execution Application would stand dismissed without further reference to the court.

(iv) If vakalatnama is filed and the amendment is carried out, all objections in the Execution Application shall be complied within a further period of four weeks, failing which the Execution Application shall stand dismissed without further reference to the court and no further application shall be entertained in execution.

(v) IA is disposed in the above terms.

(A.K. MENON, J.) Digitally signed by

SNEHA 39-IA-460-2019.doc SNEHA ABHAY DIXIT ABHAY Date:

DIXIT                 Dixit
        2021.11.23
        17:13:55
        +0530
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter