Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 15887 Bom
Judgement Date : 16 November, 2021
943.wp.13929.19.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.13929 OF 2019
THE ACCOUNTS OFFICER MAHARASHTRA STATE ELECTRICITY
DISTRIBUTION COMPANY AND ANOTHER
VERSUS
UTTAM RAGHUNATH KSHIRSAGAR
...
Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. Uday S. Malte
...
CORAM : MANGESH S. PATIL, J.
DATE : 16.11.2021 PER COURT :
None was present for the respondent employee in the first
session. The matter was kept back. None appears for him even during the
second session.
2. The learned advocate Mr. Malte submits that pursuant to the
order under challenge, the respondent employee is proceeding in contempt
and is pressing for the execution of the judgment and order. According to
the assessment in the award the petitioner has been directed to pay amount
of Rs.1,97,920/- towards arrears of pension together with interest @ 18%
per annum. He submits that since the trial court and the executing court are
pressing hard, execution and operation of the judgment and order under
challenge be stayed in terms of prayer clauses (D) and (E).
3. Having considered the submissions and the papers there shall
be ad-interim relief in terms of prayer clause (D) and (E) till the next date
943.wp.13929.19.odt
subject to the petitioner depositing an amount of Rs.2,00,000/- in the
executing court within a period of eight weeks. Stand over after eight
weeks.
(MANGESH S. PATIL, J.)
habeeb
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!