Friday, 01, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sourabh Sunil Pagar vs The State Of Maharashtra And Anr
2021 Latest Caselaw 7387 Bom

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 7387 Bom
Judgement Date : 7 May, 2021

Bombay High Court
Sourabh Sunil Pagar vs The State Of Maharashtra And Anr on 7 May, 2021
Bench: R.P. Mohite-Dere
                                                                               17-IA-1275-2021.doc



                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                             CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                 INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1275 OF 2021
                                             (FOR BAIL)
                                                 IN
                                   CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 376 OF 2021

            Sourabh Sunil Pagar                                        ...Applicant
                Versus
            The State of Maharashtra & Anr.                            ...Respondents


            Mr. Rakesh Bhatkar for the Applicant

            Mr. S. V. Gavand, A.P.P for the Respondent No.1-State
            Ms. Shraddha Sawant, appointed Advocate for the Respondent No.2


                                               CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.
                                               (THROUGH VIDEO-CONFERENCING)
                                               FRIDAY, 7th MAY 2021


            P.C. :


            1                 Heard learned counsel for the parties.



            2                 By this application, the applicant seeks suspension of his

            sentence and enlargement on bail, pending the hearing and final disposal

            of the appeal.



SQ Pathan                                                                                            1/5



                ::: Uploaded on - 07/05/2021                    ::: Downloaded on - 10/09/2021 16:37:45 :::
                                                                                17-IA-1275-2021.doc


            3                 The applicant, vide judgment and order dated 5th April 2021

            passed by the learned Extra Joint District Judge and Additional Sessions

            Judge, Ratnagiri, in Session Case No. 10/2019, has been convicted and

            sentenced as under:


                      -       for the offences punishable under Section 376(2)(j) and (n) of

                      the Indian Penal Code, to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 10 years

                      and to pay fine of Rs.10,000/-, in default of payment of fine, to

                      undergo simple imprisonment for 1 year;


                      -       for the offence punishable under Sections 3 r/w 4 of the

                      Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, to suffer rigorous

                      imprisonment for 7 years and to pay fine of Rs.10,000/-, in default of

                      payment of fine, to undergo simple imprisonment for 1 year.


                              Both the aforesaid sentences were directed to run concurrently.


                              The applicant was acquitted of the offences punishable under

                      Sections 312 and 201 r/w 34 of the Indian Penal Code.


            4                 Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant

            was on bail, pending trial. He denies that there were any relations between

SQ Pathan                                                                                            2/5



                ::: Uploaded on - 07/05/2021                    ::: Downloaded on - 10/09/2021 16:37:45 :::
                                                                                17-IA-1275-2021.doc


            the applicant, aged 19 years and victim aged 17 years 3 months, at the

            relevant time. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that there is no

            material on record i.e. doctor's evidence to show that the victim was

            sexually assaulted or that she underwent abortion.


            5                 Learned A.P.P as well as Ms. Shraddha Sawant, appointed

            advocate for the respondent No. 2 vehemently oppose the application.

            Learned appointed advocate for the respondent No. 2 submits that the

            applicant had physical relations with the victim girl i.e. respondent No. 2,

            after promising marriage to her.


            6                 It is not in dispute that the applicant was on bail pending trial

            and that whilst on bail, the applicant has not misused or abused the liberty

            granted to him.             Having heard learned counsel for the applicant, the

            applicant has prima facie made out a case for suspension of sentence and

            enlargement on bail.


            7                 Accordingly, the application is allowed and the applicant's

            sentence is suspended and he is enlarged on bail, pending the hearing and

            final disposal of his appeal, on the following terms and conditions :




SQ Pathan                                                                                            3/5



                ::: Uploaded on - 07/05/2021                    ::: Downloaded on - 10/09/2021 16:37:45 :::
                                                                                   17-IA-1275-2021.doc




                                                      ORDER

(i) The applicant be enlarged on bail on furnishing P.R.

Bond in the sum of Rs.15,000/- with one or two sureties in the like

amount;

(ii) The applicant shall report to the trial Court, once in six

months on the day/date specified by the trial Court, till his appeal is

finally disposed of;

(iii) The applicant shall not contact or threaten the victim,

witnesses or any person concerned with the case;;

(iv) The applicant shall keep the trial Court informed of his

current address and mobile contact number and/or change of

residence or mobile details, if any, from time to time;

8 The application is disposed of accordingly.

9 The High Court Legal Services Committee to pay the fees as

per Rules, to Ms. Shraddha Sawant, learned appointed Advocate who has

espoused the cause of the respondent No. 2.

SQ Pathan                                                                                               4/5




                                                                             17-IA-1275-2021.doc




            10               Copy of this order be forwarded to The High Court Legal

Services Committee, Mumbai, for information and necessary action.

11 All concerned to act on the authenticated copy of this order.

REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

SQ Pathan                                                                                         5/5




 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter