Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 5754 Bom
Judgement Date : 30 March, 2021
3. WP 12341-19 & ORS..doc
DDR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 12341 OF 2019
BAHIRAM CHANDRAKANT JEJIRAM .. PETITIONER
vs.
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH
EDUCATION DEPARTMENT (SECONDARY)
& ORS. .. RESPONDENTS
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 12432 OF 2019
PALLAVI SAHEBRAO GODSE ..PETITIONER
VS.
THE EDUCATION OFFICER (SECONDARY)
ZILLA PARISHAD, SATARA & ORS. ..RESPONDENTS
WITH
WRIT PETITION ST.NO. 29702 OF 2019
REENA KIRAN JAGTAP-GHADGE ..PETITIONER
VS.
THE EDUCATION OFFICER (SECONDARY)
ZILLA PARISHAD, SATARA & ORS. ..RESPONDENTS
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 12340 OF 2019
RENUKA SONBA AHIWALE
@ RENUKA BHIMRAO GHORPADE ..PETITIONER
VS.
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH
EDUCATION DEPARTMENT (SECONDARY)
& ORS. ..RESPONDENTS
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 12342 OF 2019
ANKUSH SHIVAJI CHAVAN ..PETITIONER
VS.
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH
EDUCATION DEPARTMENT (SECONDARY)
& ORS. ..RESPONDENTS
1 Of 3
3. WP 12341-19 & ORS..doc
------------------------
Mr. V.S. Talkute for the petitioners in WP/12341/19, WP/12340/19 &
WP/12342/19.
Mr. N.V. Bandiwadekar i/b. Vinayak Kumbhar for petitioners in
WP/12432/19 & WPST/29702/19.
Mrs. V.S. Nimbalkar, AGP in WP/12341/19.
Mr. P.P. Pujari, AGP in WP/12432/19.
Mr. P.V.N. Rajan, AGP in WPST/29702/19.
Mr. A.B. Kadam, AGP in WP/12340/19.
Mr. C.D. Mali, AGP in WP/12342/19.
------------------------
CORAM : M.S.KARNIK, J.
DATE : MARCH 30, 2021 P.C.:-
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned AGP for
the respondents - State.
2. The present Petitions pertain to the cancellation of approval
granted to the petitioners whose appointment as Shikshan Sevaks
was approved. In view of certain irregularities in the matter of
appointments, the approval came to be cancelled after issuance of
the show cause notice. The cancellation of approval is a subject
matter of the present Petitions.
3. It is pointed out that in identical set of facts, this Court had
an occasion to deal with several Petitions, Writ Petition St.No.92916
of 2020 being the lead Petition. By judgment and order dated
6/1/2021 this Court allowed the Writ Petitions.
4. Even this group of Petitions arise from the same show cause
notice which was the subject matter of Writ Petition St.No.92916 of
2 Of 3
3. WP 12341-19 & ORS..doc
2020 and others. This Court was of the view that the show cause
notice does not specify the irregularities which were allegedly
noticed by the Commissioner (Education) M.S. Pune and hence the
action based on the notice, which is completely vague and
indiscernible, is certainly not in compliance with the rules of natural
justice.
5. Learned AGP submitted that the petitioners were heard
before the impugned order came to be passed. She supported the
order cancelling approval of the petitioners.
6. I am of the view that as the controversy raised in this group
is squarely covered by the decision in Writ Petition St.No.92916 of
2020. For the same reasons, even these Petitions deserve to be
allowed and are accordingly allowed on the same terms as the Writ
Petition St.No.92916 of 2020 and others in the case of Kalpana
Ramkrishan Gavande vs. The State of Maharashtra & ors.
Digitally
signed by
Diksha
Diksha Rane
Rane Date:
2021.03.30
7. The Writ Petitions are disposed of accordingly. 18:52:02 +0530
(M.S.KARNIK, J.)
3 Of 3
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!