Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

The Ex. Engineer, Osmanabad ... vs Maharudra Malhari Ambrule And Ors
2021 Latest Caselaw 4922 Bom

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 4922 Bom
Judgement Date : 18 March, 2021

Bombay High Court
The Ex. Engineer, Osmanabad ... vs Maharudra Malhari Ambrule And Ors on 18 March, 2021
Bench: Anil S. Kilor
                                             1                            1023-CA-8522-20.odt




              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                          BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                      CIVIL APPLICATION NO.8522 OF 2020
                              IN FAST/15647/2020

         THE EX. ENGINEER, OSMANABA MEDIUM PROJECT DIV.
                             OSMANABAD
                                VERSUS
             MAHARUDRA MALHARI AMBRULE ND OTHERS
                                  ...
             Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Mukul S. Kulkarni
             Advocate for Respondent No.1 : Mr. A. S. More
           AGP for Respondents No.2 and 3 : Mr. B. V. Virdhe
                                   ...
              WITH CA/8524/2020 IN FAST/15948/2020
                                  ...
                                    CORAM : ANIL S. KILOR, J.
                                                 DATE     :     18th MARCH, 2021
PER COURT :-


Both the applications are moved by applicant-Acquiring Body for condonation of delay. There is delay of 763 days caused in filing appeals to challenge the Judgment and Award dated 24 th October, 2017 passed by learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, Paranda, in Land Acquisitions References No. 144 of 2014 and 487 of 2016.

2. Heard learned respective counsels for the parties.

3. Learned counsel for applicant points out that sufficient cause has been shown by the applicant, thereby explaining delay caused in filing first appeals. He submits that, the delay is bonafide and not intentional. If delay is condoned, no prejudice would be caused to other side.

4. The non-applicants have not filed reply opposing the applications for condonation of delay. Learned counsel for non-applicants orally opposed the applications.

2 1023-CA-8522-20.odt

5. Considering the reasons stated in the applications, I find it sufficient and justifiable reasons for delay caused in filing first appeals.

6. The civil applications are allowed. The delay is condoned. Civil Applications are disposed of.

7. Office is directed to register the appeals and place the same for admission.

( ANIL S. KILOR ) JUDGE

mtk

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter