Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 4522 Bom
Judgement Date : 11 March, 2021
18.wp.4184.17.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 4184 OF 2017
Mansub Adam Mujawar (Korbu) ... Petitioner
Versus
State of Maharashtra and Ors. ... Respondents
.........
Mr. Machhindra A. Patil for the Petitioner.
Ms. P.J. Gavhane, A.G.P. for Respondent-State.
Ms. Vaidehi Deshmukh a/w Mr. Yashodeep Deshmukh for Respondent
Nos.4 and 5.
.........
CORAM : K.K. TATED &
R.I. CHAGLA, JJ.
DATE : 11th MARCH, 2021. P.C. :- 1 Heard learned Counsel for the parties. 2 By this Petition under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution
of India, the Petitioner is challenging the judgment and order dated
21.11.2016 passed by Divisional Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee
No.1, Solapur, rejecting the Petitioner's application.
Waghmare 1 / 3
18.wp.4184.17.doc
3 During the course of argument on 11.02.2021, the learned
Advocate for the Petitioner made a statement before this Court that they
placed the Caste Validity Certificate dated 13.02.2015 issued by the Caste
Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Pune Division, Committee No.1, Solapur,
in favour of Sarfaraj Innus Mujawar, who is from his paternal side. Same
was not considered by the Committee at the time of passing impugned
order. Hence, this Court by order dated 11.02.2021 directed the learned
A.G.P., who appeared for the State, to make an enquiry and file affidavit
to that effect whether the Petitioner placed on record the said certificate
dated 13.02.2015 or not.
4 The learned A.G.P. for the State submits that they filed the
affidavit dated 24.02.2021 of Santosh Prakash Jadhav, Incharge Member
Secretary, District Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Solapur. She
submits that after verifying entire record of the present matter, they learnt
that the Petitioner has not placed the said certificate on record before
the Committee. She submits that to that effect the deponent made a
statement in para 5 of the affidavit dated 24.02.2021 which reads thus :
"5. I say that, the Petitioner never submitted Caste Validity Certificate dated 07.02.2013 in favour of Sarfraj Hamid Mujawar as also the petitioner never submitted the Caste Validity Certificate dated 13.02.2015 in favour
Waghmare 2 / 3
18.wp.4184.17.doc
of Sarfaraj Innus Mujawar. It is pertinent to note that the said Validity Certificate is pertaining to Mujawar Caste. I say that the Kasai and Mujawar both Caste are total different."
5 In view of the above mentioned facts, the submission made
by learned Counsel for the Petitioner and averments made in the Petition,
we are satisfied that though the Petitioner made out a case for admission
of the present Petition, there is no question of granting any interim relief
in favour of the Petitioner. Hence, the following order is passed :
i) Admit.
ii) No interim relief.
iii) Hearing of the Petition is expedited.
iv) The learned Counsel for the Respondent waives
service.
v) The Respondents are free to take action if they so
desire, according to law.
vi) Registry is directed to place the Writ Petition for final
hearing in weekly board as per its turn in the list of expedited Digitally
Waishali signed by Waishali S. matters.
Waghmare S.
Waghmare Date:
2021.03.15 01:29:45 +0530 ( R.I. CHAGLA, J. ) ( K.K. TATED, J. )
Waghmare 3 / 3
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!