Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 4316 Bom
Judgement Date : 9 March, 2021
(2)Apeal-174-2004.doc
rkmore
Digitally
signed by
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
Rajshree
Rajshree
More
More
Date:
2021.03.09
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
18:19:23
+0530
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.174 OF 2004
The State of Maharashtra ] ... Appellant
vs.
Pragnesh Mahendrakumar Desai & Anr. ] ... Respondents.
Ms.P.P. Shinde, APP for the State.
Mr.S.R. Mithare, for Respondent No.1.
Mr.Nitin Sejpal, for Respondent No.2.
Mr.Yogesh Deshmukh, API, Kashimira Police Station present.
CORAM : SMT.SADHANA S. JADHAV &
N.R.BORKAR, JJ.
DATE : 9th MARCH, 2021.
P.C.
1] The Respondents were indicted with a charge under
Section 302, 120B, 201 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code in CR
No.21/2003 registered at Kashimira Police Station. They were tried for
the said offences in Sessions Case No. 237 of 2003 and were acquitted
by the Judgment and order dated 26th September, 2003.
2] The State being aggrieved by the Judgment and order of
acquittal in favour of the respondents, have preferred Criminal Appeal
No.174 of 2004. At the stage of admission, both the respondents were
1/3
(2)Apeal-174-2004.doc
represented by the respective Advocates and therefore no action under
Section 390 of the Code of Criminal Procedure was taken against
them.
3] The Respondent No.2 was represented by learned counsel
Mr. Nitin Sejpal. In our previous order dated 9th February, 2020, we
have observed that learned counsel Mr. Nitin Sejpal has filed an
Affidavit demonstrating the efforts taken by him to contact Respondent
No.2. Despite several efforts by Mr. Sejpal, there was no response
from the Respondent, instead the Respondent No.2 had blocked
contact with the advocate.
4] It appears from record that, at the time of trial and
admission of the Appeal the Respondent no.2 was residing at
Bungalow No.9, Tulsi, Shreeji Shraddha Society, Karelobaug, Baroda,
Gujarat State. However, at the time of arresting the Respondent No.1
at Vadodara, the Kashimira Police Station had also taken efforts to
arrest the Respondent No.2 on the address given by the learned
counsel and on which letters sent by the Advocate were received.
However, upon enquiry, step sister of Respondent no.2 namely
Mrs.Kinjal Shaha has reported that ever since 2004 Respondent no.2 is
residing at United Kingdom (England). She has feigned ignorance
about the address of Respondent No.2. However, the report shows
2/3
(2)Apeal-174-2004.doc
that his cellphone no. is +447497370077.
5] In view of this fact, we are constrained to issue Non
Bailable Warrant against Respondent No.2. Hence, the following order
is passed :
ORDER
i] Issue Non-Bailable Warrant against Respondent No.2 returnable on 6th April, 2021;
ii] A look out notice to be issued forthwith against Respondent No.2 and the same be circulated to all Airports;
iii] The Commissioner of Police, Mira-Bhayander, Vasai and Virar Division, shall personally look into the matter and make every possible effort to get the NBW executed;
iv] The State shall send a copy of the NBW to the UK Embassy and submit a report to that effect within two weeks. The Registry shall issue notice to the UK Embassy about pendency of this appeal against acquittal before this Court.;
v] Matter to appear on board on 6th April, 2021.
[N.R.BORKAR, J] [SMT.SADHANA S. JADHAV, J]
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!