Mansingh Popat Kharat And Ors vs The State Of Maharashtra Through ...
2021 Latest Caselaw 4245 Bom

           Digitally signed
Jitendra   by Jitendra S.
           Nijasure
S.         Date:
Nijasure   2021.03.18
           12:21:31 +0530

                                                                       52-wp-785-2021.doc

       jsn

                              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                     CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                       WRIT PETITION NO.785 OF 2021


                   Mansingh Popat Kharat & Ors.                      ...Petitioners

                              Versus

                   The State of Maharashtra & Ors.                   ...Respondents

                                                    ----------
                   Mr. Pramod Kulkarni, for the Petitionrs.
                   Mr. C.D. Mali, AGP for State.
                   Mr. Pankaj Deokar for Respondent No.5.
                                                    ----------

                                                    CORAM :        K.K. TATED &
                                                                   R.I. CHAGLA, JJ.
                                                    DATE         : 9TH MARCH, 2021

                   ORDER :

1. Heard learned Counsel for parties.

2. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. By consent of

parties matter taken up for fnal hearing.

3. By this Writ Petition fled under Article 226 of the

Constitution of India, the Petitioners are seeking a direction

against the Zilla Parishad - Respondent to pay the wages of the

Petitioners at the minimum of the pay scale (at the lowest

52-wp-785-2021.doc

grade, in the regular pay scale.)

4. Learned Counsel Mr. Pramod Kulkarni for the Petitioners

submits that the Petitioners are working as ambulance drivers

on contractual basis with Respondent No.5 Zilla Parishad's

Primary Health Centers. He submits that their duties are 24

hours and salary is paid to all the Petitioners. Although the

monthly remuneration is to be paid to the Petitioners, they are

paid after 5 to 6 months and that too not at the minimum of

pay scale (at the lowest grade), in the regular pay scale which

they are entitled. Thus it is a clear act of exploitation by the

Respondents.

5. The learned Counsel for the Petitioners submits that this

issue was before the Nagpur bench of this Court in Writ Petition

No.2247 of 2014. He submits that Nagpur bench by order dated

20th November, 2019 after considering all the facts and the

view taken by the Supreme Court in State of Punjab & Ors. Vs.

Jagjit Singh & Ors.1 allowed the Petition fled by drivers of Zilla

Parishad for payment of minimum wages to the Petitioners. He

relies upon paragraphs 11 and 12 of the said order which read

thus:-

1    (2017) 1 SCC 148.

                                    52-wp-785-2021.doc

11. It is clear that the Hon'ble Supreme Court has held that when one employee discharges / performs same work as another employee, there cannot be any distinction between the two employees so far as the application of the pay scale to both of them is concerned. The Hon'ble Apex Court has further held that all the temporary employees who are performing similar work as the regular employees would be entitled to draw wages at the minimum of the pay scale (at the lowest grade, in the regular pay scale) extended to regular employees holding the same post. This relief would also have to be granted to all the petitioners as there is no dispute that their work is similar to the work of the regular drivers.

12. Accordingly, the writ petition is partly allowed. The petitioners are granted same protection as the similarly situated drivers have been granted by the Division Bench of this Court in Writ Petition No.6025/2015 decided on 29/06/2017. We further direct that the petitioners be paid wages at the minimum of the pay scale (at the lowest grade, in the regular pay scale) extended to regular employees holding the same post with effect from the date of the petition. All arrears be calculated accordingly and paid by the respondent no.1 to the petitioners within a period of six months from the date of the order.

At this juncture, the learned Counsel for the petitioners, upon instructions, submits that few of the petitioners have been terminated from service by the respondent no.1 on account of some misconduct. If this is so, we make it clear, those petitioners whose services have been terminated on account of misconduct, shall not be entitled to the benefts of this judgment. We also make it clear that these benefts shall be extendable to all other similarly situated contractual drivers who are not party to this

52-wp-785-2021.doc

petition.

Rule is made absolute in the aforesaid terms. No order as to costs.

6. Learned Counsel for Petitioners submits from the said

order dated 20th November, 2019 an SLP was preferred before

the Apex Court. The SLP was on board on 22nd February, 2021,

at that time, the Apex Court passed the following order:-

"Delay condoned.

We are not inclined to interfere with the order passed by the High Court. The Special Leave Petition is dismissed. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.

7. Learned Counsel for the Petitioners submits that in

similar way, this Court by order dated 8th December, 2020 in

Nagendrayya P. Hiremath & Ors. Vs. The State of Maharashtra

& Ors.2 along with companion matters directed the Zilla

Parishad to pay wages at the minimum of the pay scale at the

lowest grade, in the regular pay scale extended to the regular

employees holding the same post with effect from the date of

the petition. Paragraph 6 of the said order reads thus:-

"6. The fact that the petitioners in above referred judgment were contractual employees is not disputed. We are, therefore, of the opinion that the 2Writ Petition (St.) No.92250 of 2020.

52-wp-785-2021.doc

issue involved in all these petitions is covered by view taken by this Court in its judgment dated 20.11.2019 in above referred writ petition. Accordingly, the following order is passed. a. The petitioners be paid wages at the minimum of the pay scale at the lowest grade, in the regular pay scale extended to the regular employees holding the same post with effect from the date of the petition.

b. The respondent No.5 is directed to comply with this order within six months from today.

c. No order as to costs.

8. Learned Counsel for the Petitioners has submitted that

the above referred orders have been followed by this Division

Bench in Shri Vasant Pandurang Patil & Ors. Vs. The State of

Maharashtra & Ors.3

9. Learned Counsel for the Petitioners submits that as the

issue involved in the present Writ Petition is already covered

by the orders of this Court as well as Apex Court, the present

Petition may be allowed.

10. On the other hand, the learned Counsel Mr Pankaj Deokar

appearing on behalf of the Respondent No.5 submits that,

factually the Petitioners were appointed on contract basis. He

3Writ Petition (St.) No.9985 of 2020 decided on 1st March, 2021.

52-wp-785-2021.doc

further submits that the Petitioners have not made contractor

- Royal Security and Allied Services, Kadepur, Dist. Sangli as a

party Respondent in the present Writ Petition. Hence there is

no question of entertaining the present Writ Petition and same

is required to be dismissed with costs.

11. The learned Counsel for Respondent No.5 submits that

since the Petitioners are not in direct employment with the

Respondent Zilla Parishad the rules which are applicable to the

permanent employees are not applicable to the Petitioners. The

decision of this Court and the Apex Court relied upon by the

learned Counsel for the Petitioners were decided according to

the facts of those cases and are not applicable to the present

case.

12. We have considered the rival submissions. We are of the

view that the issue arising in the present Petition has been

covered by the orders passed by this Court as stated above as

well as affrmed by the Apex Court on 22nd February, 2021.

These were cases of similarly situated ambulance drivers who

were granted protection i.e. payment of wages at the minimum

of the pay scale (at the lowest grade) in the regular pay scale

extended to regular employees holding the same post with

52-wp-785-2021.doc

effect from the date of the Petitions. For the reasons stated in

these orders, we are satisfed that the Petitioners have made

out a case to allow this Writ Petition. Hence the following

order:-

i. The Petitioners be paid wages at the minimum of the

pay scale at the lowest grade, in the regular pay scale extended

to the regular employees holding the same post with effect from

the date of the petition.

ii. The Respondent No.5 is directed to comply with this

order within a period of three months from today.

iii. Parties to act on an authenticated copy of this order.

iv. Rule is made absolute on the above terms.

v. Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly with no order as

to costs.

      [R.I. CHAGLA J.]                    [K.K. TATED, J.]