Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 8321 Bom
Judgement Date : 22 June, 2021
4.ALS.3.2021.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL (STATE ) NO.3 OF 2021
The State of Maharashtra ....Appellant
Versus
Vishal Balasaheb @ Parshuram Sakhare ....Respondent
***
Mr. Arfan Sait, APP for Appellant
***
CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE &
SURENDRA P. TAVADE, JJ.
DATE : 22nd JUNE, 2021 PER COURT : 1. Heard learned APP.
2. By inviting our attention to the judgment and order passed by the
learned Additional Sessions Judge, Pune in Sessions Case No.299/2015 and
more particularly the evidence brought on record by the prosecution in respect
of the ocular testimony of a child witness, the learned APP submits that the trial
Court committed a serious error in appreciating the evidence. It is also the
submission of learned APP that it was an undisputed fact that the relationship
between the accused and deceased was of husband and wife and on the
Aarti Palkar 1/2
4.ALS.3.2021.doc
backdrop of this fact, the learned trial Court ought to have appreciated the case
of prosecution submitted before the Court. Learned APP also submits that the
P.M. notes issued by the autopsy surgeon clearly shows that the deceased
received as many as ten injuries including Injury No.1 and 2 on the face of
deceased. It is the submission of learned APP that these injuries correspond
with the version of witness that the accused initially gave a blow of laptop to the
deceased.
3. Issue notice to the Respondent returnable on 06.07.2021.
[SURENDRA P. TAVADE, J.] [PRASANNA B. VARALE, J.] Aarti Palkar 2/2
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!