Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 7671 Bom
Judgement Date : 10 June, 2021
1 of 2 6. cr.apeal.1074.2018.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1074 OF 2018
Mukthar @ Raj jakir Khan ...Appellant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent
.....
Mr. Aashish Satpute for the Appellant.
Mr. Arfan Sait, APP for the Respondent-State.
CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE AND
SURENDRA P. TAVADE, JJ.
DATE : 10th JUNE, 2021. P.C. :
1. The Appellant Mukthar @ Raj jakir Khan is Accused No. 3 in
Sessions Case No. 210 of 2016. The Appellant Mukthar Khan
preferred the present appeal challenging the Judgment and Order of
the trial Court in Sessions Case No. 210 of 2016, along with other
accused persons. The learned Counsel appearing for the Appellant
Mukthar @ Raj jakir Khan invited our attention to the Judgment and
Order passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Nashik and
submitted that the Appellant had deposited fne amount to the tune of
Rs. 25,000/-. The learned Counsel further submitted that due to
inadvertence, the copy of the appeal memo was not supplied to the
office. The learned Counsel for the Appellant prays some time so as
R.V.Patil
2 of 2 6. cr.apeal.1074.2018.doc
to supply the copy to the office. At the request of the learned Counsel
for the Appellant, two weeks time is granted to supply the copy to the
office. On receipt of the copy, the office to issue notice to the added
Respondent making the same returnable within four weeks.
2. Stand over to 8th July, 2021.
(SURENDRA P. TAVADE, J.) (PRASANNA B. VARALE, J.)
R.V.Patil
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!