Friday, 01, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Dipali Ramdas Garud Thrugh Father ... vs The State Of Maharashtra And ...
2021 Latest Caselaw 983 Bom

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 983 Bom
Judgement Date : 15 January, 2021

Bombay High Court
Dipali Ramdas Garud Thrugh Father ... vs The State Of Maharashtra And ... on 15 January, 2021
Bench: S.V. Gangapurwala, Shrikant Dattatray Kulkarni
                                          1
                                                                 W.P. 3424-2020

                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,
                          BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                          WRIT PETITION NO. 3424 OF 2020

Kum. Dipali d/o Ramdas Garud
u/g of Natural Guardian father
Shri Rameshwrao s/o Kondiba Garud                                   ..Petitioner

        Versus

The State of Maharashtra and ors.                                   ..Respondents

Mr A.S. Golegaonkar, Advcoate for petitioner
Mr P.S. Patil, Addl.G.P. for respondents no.1, 2, 3 and 6
Mr D.G. Nagode, Advocate for respondents no.4 and 5

                                  CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA AND
                                         SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, JJ.

DATE : 15th January 2021

PER COURT :

1. The caste claim of the petitioner as Thakur - Scheduled Tribe is

invalidated.

2. Learned Advocate for the petitioner submits that one of the paternal

relatives of the petitioner Swati daughter of Narayan Garud is issued with the

validity certificate. The learned Advocate for the petitioner submits that all

the entries in the school record of the petitioner, his father, uncle record

caste as Thakur. The respondent - Committee has relied upon one entry of

paternal aunt of the petitioner Shivnanda stating that her caste is recorded as

Maratha. The petitioner's paternal aunt Shivnanda is at Sr.no.5 and only

hyphen is marked. The caste Maratha is not mentioned. There are no

contrary entries on record. The learned Counsel for the petitioner submits

that show cause notice is issued to the paternal relative of the petitioner.

Learned Counsel further submits that the affinity test is not a litmus test and

relied on the judgment of the Apex Court in case of Anand vs Committee

for Scrutiny and Verification of Tribe Claims and Ors. reported in (2012)

1 SCC 113. Learned Counsel also relied upon the judgment of Division

W.P. 3424-2020

Bench of this Court Apoorva d/o Vinay Nichale Vs. Divisional Caste

Certificate Scrutiny Committee No.1 and others, reported in 2010 (6)

Mh.L.J. 401 to submit that the validity issued to the near relative is a relevant

fact.

3. The leaned A.G.P. submits that in the school entry of the paternal aunt

of the petitioner her caste is mentioned as Maratha. In respect of other

maternal relatives of the petitioner, caste is recorded as Maratha or as

Thakar. The petitioner failed in the affinity test.

4. We have considered the submissions. The petitioner has relied on

following documents:



v-           nLr,sotkps uko        nLr,sotkaojhy                vtZnkjk'kh tkrhph          izos'[email protected] uksan.kh
dza-                               O;Drhaps uko                    ukrs     uksan             fnukad
1-      tekr izek.ki=              fnikyh jes'kjko x#M        vtZnkj dza-1        Bkdwj    [email protected]@2011
2-      izos'k fuxZe mrkjk         fnikyh jes'kjko x#M         vtZnkj dza-1      Bkdwj     [email protected]@2007
3-      izos'k fuxZe mrkjk         fnikyh jes'kjko x#M         vtZnkj dza-1 fganw Bkdwj    [email protected]@2011
4-      'kkGk lksMY;kps izek.ki=   fnikyh jes'kjko x#M        vtZnkj dza-1        Bkdwj    [email protected]@2011
5-      vk/kkj dkMZ                fnikyh jes'kjko x#M        vtZnkj dza-1      ----             ----
6-      uequk Q o oa'kkoG          jes'k        dksMhackjko   vtZnkj dz-2        Bkdwj     [email protected]@2019
                                   x#M
7-      izos'k fuxZe mrkjk         jes'k dksMhackjko x#M      vtZnkj   dza-2      Bkdwj    17-06-1980
8-      izos'k fuxZe mrkjk         jes'k dksaMhckjko x#M      vtZnkj   dza-2      Bkdwj    25-06-1987
9-      'kkGk lksMY;kps izek.ki=   jes'k dksMhack x#M         vtZnkj   dza-2      Bkdwj    17-06-1980
10      'kkGk lksMY;kps izek.ki=   jes'k dksMhack x#M         vtZnkj   dza-2      Bkdwj    25-09-1992
11      lsokiVkps izFke i`"B       jes'k dksMhack x#M         vtZnkj   dza-2      Bkdwj        ---
12      'kkGk lksMY;kps izek.ki=   jes'k dksMhack x#M         vtZnkj   dza-2      Bkdwj    25-6-1987

13 tekrhps izek.ki=                jes'k dksMhack x#M         vtZnkj dza-2        Bkdwj    31-10-2011






                                                                              W.P. 3424-2020

14           [email protected] mrkjk          jes'k dksaMck x#M   vtZnkj dza-2            ----    [email protected]@2012
15    ikg.khi=d                  dksMw fdlu Bkdwj        vktksck               ---   1955&56
16    [kkljk ikg.kh i=d          dksaMc25-k fdlu         vktksck                --   1954&55
17    [email protected] mrkjk                 dksaMck fdlu Bkdwj      vktksck               --    1958&59
18    [email protected] mrkjk                 dksaMck fdlu o jes'k vktksck o                --    1978&79
                                 dksaMck x#M          vtZnkj dz-a 2
19 e`R;w izek.ki=                dksaMckjko fdlu x#M     vktksck              ---    10-03-2003
                                 ¼Bkdwj½
20    tekrhps izek.ki=           lqf'ky jes'k x#M          HkkÅ              Bkdwj   04-07-2011
21    izos'k fuxZe mrkjk         lqf'ky jes'k x#M          HkkÅ              Bkdwj   28-06-2002
22    'kkGk lksMY;kpk nk[kyk     lqf'ky jes'k x#M          HkkÅ              Bkdwj   16-6-2011
23    'kkGk lksMY;kps izek.ki=   lqf'ky jes'k x#M          HkkÅ              Bkdwj   21-06-2007
24-   'kkGk lksMY;kps izek.ki=   lqf'ky jes'k x#M          HkkÅ              Bkdwj   16-6-2011
25-   'kkGk lksMY;kps izek.ki=   lqf'ky jes'k x#M          HkkÅ              Bkdwj   28-06-2013
26-   izos'k fuxZe mrkjk         txnh'k jes'k x#M          HkkÅ              Bkdwj   30-06-2010
27-   izos'k fuxZe mrkjk         txnh'k jes'k x#M          HkkÅ              Bkdwj   15-06-2011
28-   tekrhps izek.ki=           txnh'k jes'k x#M              HkkÅ          Bkdwj 04-07-2011
29-   'kkGk lksMY;kpk nk[kyk     txnh'k jes'k x#M              HkkÅ          Bkdwj 15-6-2011
30-   [email protected] mrkjk                 lksiku foBksck Bkdwj      pqyr vktksck       --       --
31-   oS/krk    izek.ki=     o   guqeku lksiku x#M           ekolHkkÅ        Bkdwj 12-01-2011
      'kiFki=
32-   oS/krk    izek.ki=     o   lksiku Hkkxor x#M        esOgq.khpk eqyxk   Bkdwj 28-09-2011
      'kiFki=
33-   oS/krk    izek.ki=     o   Lokrh ukjk;.k x#M          pqyr pqyr        Bkdwj 29-05-1998
      'kiFki=                                                  cgh.k
34-   oS/krk    izek.ki=     o   Hkkxor ia<jhukFk x#M         ukryx          Bkdwj 27-08-2001
      'kiFki=
35-   oS/krk    izek.ki=     o   lafni izdk'k pOgk.k         vkrsHkkÅ        Bkdwj 27-01-2004
      'kiFki=
36-   oS/krk    izek.ki=     o   ijes'oj Hkkxor dne       ekol vkrsHkkÅ      Bkdwj 09-11-2010
      'kiFki=
37-   oS/krk    izek.ki=     o   enu fd'kujko dne         cfg.khP;k uaunspk Bkdwj 19-09-2005
      'kiFki=                                             eqyxk ¼vkrsHkkŽ
38    fuoM.kwd vksG[ki=          jes'k dksaMhck x#M       vtZnkj dzekad 2 --          ---






                                                                W.P. 3424-2020

5. The school entries in case of maternal relative of the petitioner would

not be relevant. In many of the maternal relatives' school record, caste is

recorded as Thakur.

6. The affinity is not a litmus test as is held in case of Anand vs

Committee for Scrutiny and Verification of Tribe Claims (supra). The

show cause notice is issued to the validity holder relied upon by the

petitioner.

7. In light of above, the impugned order is quashed and set aside.

8. The Committee shall issue validity certificate to the petitioner as

Thakur -Scheduled Tribe immediately.

9. The said validity certificate would be subject to the decision that would

be taken by the Committee in the proceedings re-opened of the validity

holders relied by the petitioner.

10. Writ Petition disposed of. No costs.

( SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, J.) ( S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J.)

vvr

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter