Friday, 01, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Vasant Shankar Waghmare And ... vs Superintendent Of Cenral ...
2021 Latest Caselaw 774 Bom

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 774 Bom
Judgement Date : 13 January, 2021

Bombay High Court
Vasant Shankar Waghmare And ... vs Superintendent Of Cenral ... on 13 January, 2021
Bench: S.B. Shukre, Avinash G. Gharote
 Judgment                                  1                         Cri.W.P.13.2021.odt


               IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,
                         NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.

                    CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 13 OF 2021


 1)       Vasant Shankar Waghmare,
          Aged about 38 years, Occu. - Nil,
          R/o. At. Post. Galsure, Adiwasi Wadi,
          Tah. Shriwardhan, District Raigad,
          (Presently Central Prison Amravati
          No. 5404)

 2)       Dipak Narayan Patil,
          Aged about 40 years,
          R/o. Pitkari, Post Kusumbale,
          Tah. Alibagh, District Raigad.

                                                            .... PETITIONERS

                                    // VERSUS //

          Superintendent of
          Central Prisoner, Amravati,
          District Amravati.
                                                .... RESPONDENT
  ______________________________________________________________
      Shri S. D. Chande, counsel for the petitioners.
      Miss T. H. Khan, A.P.P. for the respondent.
 ______________________________________________________________

                           CORAM : SUNIL B. SHUKRE AND
                                   AVINASH G. GHAROTE, JJ.

DATED : 13th January, 2021.

ORAL JUDGMENT : (Per : SUNIL B. SHUKRE, J.)

1. Issue notice for final disposal at admission stage to the

respondent. Learned A.P.P. waives service of notice for respondent.

Judgment 2 Cri.W.P.13.2021.odt

2. Heard. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith.

3. Heard finally by consent of the learned counsel appearing

for the parties.

4. The petitioner is demanding access of telephone facility

available in the prison. The issue is squarely covered by the view taken

by this Court in the case of Dhirendera Vijay Yadav Vs. Dy. Director

General of Police, decided on 02.01.2020.

5. Accordingly, the petition is allowed.

Respondent is directed to provide telephone facility to the

petitioner in terms of circular dated 12.02.2019, provided they fulfills

all other conditions contained therein.

Rule accordingly. No costs.

(AVINASH G. GHAROTE, J.) (SUNIL B. SHUKRE J.)

Kirtak

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter