Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 69 Bom
Judgement Date : 4 January, 2021
Order 0401apeal138.20
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 138/2020.
Utkranti Nagari Sahakari pat Santha Ltd.
-VERSUS-
Bhaskar Waman Gaikwad.
Office notes, Office Memoranda of
Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's Orders
or directions and Registrar's orders.
Shri P.A. Kadu, Advocate for the Appellant.
Shri D.R. Upadhyay, Advocate for Respondent.
CORAM : VINAY JOSHI, J.
DATE : JANUARY 04, 2021.
Heard.
2. This is an appeal of the original
complainant challenging the order of acquittal of
respondent passed in cheque bouncing case
namely S.C.C. No. 846/2013. This Court has
already granted leave to prefer the appeal vide
order dated 18.02.2020.
3. With the assistance of learned counsel
for the parties, I have gone through the impugned
Order 0401apeal138.20
judgment. It is brought to my notice that the trial
Court has acquitted the accused since there is no
proof regarding service of statutory demand
notice. He has pointed out certain portion from
paragraph no.10 of the judgment wherein the trial
Court has referred to acknowledgment [Exh.29]
with comment that the same shows service of
notice.
4. Precisely the inconsistencies in finding
has been pointed out. There is an arguable issue
in the matter, hence, Admit. Call for R & P.
Learned counsel appearing for respondent waives
notice.
5. At this juncture, learned counsel submit
that there are chances of amicable settlement and
they desire to take instructions to that effect from
their respective clients. List the matter for
consideration of this aspect only on 18.01.2021.
JUDGE Rgd.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!