Friday, 01, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sahikh Sadiya Almas Wahid Tadvi ... vs The State Of Maharashtra And ...
2021 Latest Caselaw 242 Bom

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 242 Bom
Judgement Date : 6 January, 2021

Bombay High Court
Sahikh Sadiya Almas Wahid Tadvi ... vs The State Of Maharashtra And ... on 6 January, 2021
Bench: S.V. Gangapurwala, Shrikant Dattatray Kulkarni
                                              1                        961 wp 6916-20.odt

        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                   BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                  961 WRIT PETITION NO.6916 OF 2020

           SAHIKH SADIYA ALMAS WAHID TADVI AND OTHERS
                               VERSUS
              THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
                                   ...
              Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. C. R. Thorat
            AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 : Mr. S.K. Tambe
                                   ...

                                    CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA &
                                                  SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, JJ.
                                    DATED : 6th JANUARY , 2021.
                                        ...
PER COURT :

.      The petitioner are challenging the show cause notice issued

to them seeking reopening of the validation proceedings.


2.     The petitioners are issued with the validity certifcate of

'Tadavi' Scheduled Tribe by the committee.                         The show cause

notice is issued to the petitioners on the count that the persons

namely 1) Abdul Ajij Abdul Hakik Shaikh 2) Ku. Maseera Parvin

Mohd. Ashfak Shaikh 3) Ku. Saba Mohd. Ajaj Shaikh and 4) Ku.

Irfana Bano Abdul Majid Shaikh had applied for issuance of

validity certifcate of 'Tadavi' Scheduled Tribe and they had

pleaded that the present petitioners are validity holders and their

relatives. The committee invalidated the claim of these persons




     ::: Uploaded on - 08/01/2021                        ::: Downloaded on - 06/02/2021 22:54:14 :::
                                          2                              961 wp 6916-20.odt

and as such show cause notice is issued to the petitioners as to

why the validity granted to the petitioners should not be

reconsidered.


3.     It is pointed out that Ku. Maseera Parvin Mohd. Ashfak

Shaikh and Ku. Saba Mohd. Ajaj Shaikh had fled Writ Petition No.

5641 of 2020 before this Court against the invalidation of the

tribe claim as 'Tadavi' Scheduled Tribe.                         This Court under

judgment and order dated 9th October, 2020 set aside the

judgment of the committee and directed the committee to issue

validity certifcate to the petitioners of Writ Petition No. 5641 of

2020.


4.     This Court on 9th October, 2020 passed the following

operative order in Writ Petition No. 5641 of 2020 fled by Ku.

Maseera and Ku. Saba.

              "1)      The      impugned        judgment      and       order        is
              quashed and set aside.
              2)       The          Committee     shall       issue         validity
              certifcates to the petitioners of Tadvi Scheduled
              Tribe.
              3)       In case, the judgment of this Court, in Writ
              Petition No. 430 of 1992 dated 03.05.2014 are
              reviewed, then the respondents may proceed
              against the petitioners in accordance with law.




     ::: Uploaded on - 08/01/2021                         ::: Downloaded on - 06/02/2021 22:54:14 :::
                                     3                          961 wp 6916-20.odt

              4)      Writ petition is accordingly disposed of.           No
              costs".


5.      The basis for issuance of the show cause notice to the

petitioners for reopening the validity granted them does not

survive as this Court has set aside the judgment of the

committee in case of Ku. Maseera and Ku. Saba in Writ Petition

No. 5641 of 2020 under judgment and order dated 9 th October,

2020.


6.      In light of above, we pass the following order :

                                    ORDER

1) The impugned show cause notice is quashed

and set aside.

2) In case, the judgment of this Court, in Writ

Petition No. 430 of 1992 dated 03.05.2014 are

reviewed, then the respondents may proceed

against the petitioners in accordance with law.

3) Rule is accordingly made absolute in the

above terms.

4) Writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

(SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, J.) (S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.) vsm/-

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter