Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Pravin S/O. Yadaorao Manpe vs State Of Maharashtra Thr. P.S.O. ...
2021 Latest Caselaw 1470 Bom

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 1470 Bom
Judgement Date : 21 January, 2021

Bombay High Court
Pravin S/O. Yadaorao Manpe vs State Of Maharashtra Thr. P.S.O. ... on 21 January, 2021
Bench: Z.A. Haq, Amit B. Borkar
                                                               28 apl 939.18.jud.odt
                                             1/4



             IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                       NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.

               CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APL) NO.939 OF 2018



  1.              Pravin S/o Yadaorao Manpe,
                  Aged about 42 years, Occ. Lawyer,
                  R/o Flat No.G-1, Kabir Palace, Om
                  Nagar, Koradi Road, Nagpur                         ....APPLICANT


                                      // VERSUS //


  1.              State of Maharashtra,
                  through the P.S.O. Khaparkheda, Tq.
                  Saoner, Distt. Nagpur.


  2.              Kulsum Nasir Khan,
                  Aged about 17 years, Occupation:
                  Education - Minor through natural
                  guardian father Nasir Khan, R/o.
                  WCL Colony, Qtr. No.83/5,
                  Chankapur, Tq. Saoner, Distt. Nagpur        .... NON-APPLICANTS

  Shri Mahesh Rai, Advocate for the applicant.
  Shri N.S. Rao, A.P.P. for the non-applicant No.1/State.
  ______________________________________________________________________
                               CORAM : Z. A. HAQ AND
                                          AMIT B. BORKAR, JJ.

DATE : 21.01.2021.

ORAL JUDGMENT: [PER: AMIT B. BORKAR, J.]

1. Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith.

2. This is an application under Section 482 of the Code of

28 apl 939.18.jud.odt

Criminal Procedure challenging the First Information Report

registered with Crime No.331/2018 dated 12th July 2018 for the

offences punishable under Sections 363, 366-A, 376 (2)(i)(n), 354,

344, 109 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and under Sections 4 and

8 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012.

3. The First Information Report came to be registered

against the applicant and other nine persons with the accusations

that the applicant advised co-accused that they will kill the victim

and rest of the matter will be sorted out by the applicant. It is also

alleged that the applicant demanded an amount of Rs.90,000/- for

the said work.

4. The applicant, therefore, filed present application before

this Court challenging the registration of the First Information

Report. This Court on 26th November 2018 issued notice to the non-

applicants. The non-applicant No.2 is served but has not appeared

either personally or through advocate. The non-applicant No.1 has

filed reply. It is stated that the victim heard the chatting between

Kaushallaya and the applicant that they wanted to kill the victim

and the dead body of the victim should not be thrown here and

there. Instead it was suggested that they should bury the dead

28 apl 939.18.jud.odt

body. It is also stated in the reply that the applicant has instigated

other accused to commit the offence in question.

5. We have carefully considered the contents in the First

Information Report. The sum and substance of the allegations

against the applicant is that the applicant instigated other co-

accused of the crime by suggesting that he will take care of the

matter and also suggested how to bury body of the victim. From the

accusations in the report, it appears that the offence punishable

under Sections which are registered against other accused are as

under:-

"363, 366-A, 376 (2)(i)(n), 354, 344, 109 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code and also under Sections 4 and 8 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012".

6. After carefully considering the ingredients of the offence

alleged against the applicant, we are satisfied that none of the

essential ingredients of the offence alleged against the applicant are

made out, even if the allegations in the First Information Report are

assumed to be correct. We are therefore, satisfied that the

continuance of proceeding against the applicant would amount to

abuse of process of Court.

28 apl 939.18.jud.odt

7. We, therefore, pass the following order:-

(i) The First Information Report No.331/2018 dated

12th July 2018 registered with the non-applicant No.1-Police Station

for the offences punishable under Sections 363, 366-A, 376(2)(i)

(n), 354, 344, 109 r/w Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code and also

under Sections 4 and 8 of the Protection of Children from Sexual

Offences Act, 2012 is quashed and set aside as against the applicant

Pravin Yadaorap Mandpe only.

Rule is made absolute in the above terms.

                             JUDGE                              JUDGE
manisha





 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter