Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 1164 Bom
Judgement Date : 18 January, 2021
9-CA-6274-19.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.6274 OF 2019
IN FAST/20104/2018
CHANDRAKALA BHASKAR KURHADE AND OTHERS
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA
...
Advocate for Applicants : Shri Vishnu B. Madan
Advocate for Respondent : Shri M. N. Nawandar
...
CORAM : B. U. DEBADWAR, J.
DATE : 18th JANUARY, 2021 PER COURT :
1. Heard Shri V. B. Madan, learned advocate for the
applicant and Shri M. N. Nawandar, learned advocate for the sole
respondent.
2. This is an application for condonation of delay of 101
days caused in preferring appeal against judgment and order dated
13-12-2017, passed by the learned Railway Claims Tribunal, Nagpur
in OA (IIU)/NGP/2015/0321, whereby the claim is rejected.
3. In paragraph 3 of the application the grounds of delay
have been set out. According to Shri V. B. Madan, learned
advocate, the grounds set out in paragraph 3 of the application are
sufficient to condone the delay of 101 days, whereas according to
Shri Nawandar, learned advocate, the said are not at all sufficient to
condone the delay.
SVH 1 of 2
9-CA-6274-19.odt
4. Having regard to the facts of the claim before tribunal
and grounds set out in paragraph 3 of the application, it cannot be
said that the delay was either intentional or due to negligence of
the applicants.
5. In view of the above, application is allowed. Delay of
101 days caused in preferring appeal is condoned.
6. Appeal be registered if it stands in scrutiny.
(B. U. DEBADWAR, J.)
SVH 2 of 2
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!