Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 3404 Bom
Judgement Date : 23 February, 2021
1 Cr.APL No.319.21 J
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APL) NO.319 OF 2021
1. Abhay S/o. Dudhram Pawar,
Aged about 30 years, Occu.: Private,
2. Smt. Jayshree W/o. Dudhram Pawar,
Aged about 53 years, Occu.: Housewife,
3. Dudhram S/o. Late Chapla Pawar,
Aged about 63 years, Occ.: Retired,
R/o. Flat No.106, Gurulaxmi Heights,
Near Beltarodi Police Station,
Beltarodi, Nagpur.
4. Smt. Madhuri W/o. Pruthviraj Rathod,
Aged about 34 years, Occ. Housewife,
5. Pruthviraj S/o. Bhanusingh Rathod,
Aged about 36 years, Occ. Agriculturalist,
Both 5 and 6 R/o. Swami Niwas,
Jagdamba Mandir Road, Grin Park
Shrirampur, Yavatmal.
6. Smt. Angha W/o. Nilesh Chawhan,
Aged about 29 years, Occ.: Doctor,
R/o. Plot No.12, Vilas Nagar,
Chausala Road, Yavatmal,
7. Smt. Pooja W/o. Abhay Pawar,
Aged about 31 years, Occu.: Nil,
R/o. Ajinkya Plaza, Gokulpeth,
Nagpur. ....APPLICANTS
// VERSUS //
State of Maharashtra,
through Police Station Officer,
Police Station, Sonegaon, Nagpur. .... NON-APPLICANT
Shri A. S. Shukla, Advocate for the applicants.
Ms. Mayuri Deshmukh, A.P.P. for the non-applicant/State.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
::: Uploaded on - 25/02/2021 ::: Downloaded on - 25/02/2021 21:03:58 :::
2 Cr.APL No.319.21 J
CORAM : Z. A. HAQ AND
AMIT B. BORKAR, JJ.
DATE : 23.02.2021.
ORAL JUDGMENT : [PER: AMIT B. BORKAR, J.]
1. Heard.
2. Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith.
3. This joint application filed by the accused and the
informant for quashing the charge-sheet No.09/2019 dated
24.04.2019 in pursuance of the First Information Report
No.236/2018 dated 21.12.2018 and charge-sheet No.23/2020
dated 06.06.2020 in pursuance of the First Information Report
No.244/2018 dated 30.12.2018.
4. The First Information Report came to be registered
against the applicant Nos.1 to 6 with the accusations that the
applicants physically and mentally harassed the applicant No.7. It is
further alleged that the applicants have abused the applicant No.7.
5. During pendency of the proceedings before the Trial
Court, parties have amicably settled their dispute. The parties have
placed on record an application filed before the Judge, Family Court
No.3, Nagpur in petition under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage
Act,1955. In the said application, by way of clause - (e), the
applicant No.1 and applicant No.7 have agreed that the applicant
No.7 is ready to withdraw criminal proceedings initiated against the
applicants. The said application has been allowed by the Family
Court by order dated 13.01.2021 and has been converted into
proceedings under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.
The applicant No.7 has affirmed the said application and has stated
that the dispute between the applicant Nos.1 to 6 and applicant
No.7 has been amicably resolved.
6. We have carefully considered the allegations in the First
Information Report and the material in the charge-sheet. We have
satisfied that the offences alleged against the applicant Nos. 1 to 6
are personal in nature. Since the applicants have amicably settled
their dispute, the chances of conviction are bleak.
7. The Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Madan Mohan
Abbot Vs. State of Punjab reported in (2008) 4 SCC 582 has taken
view that when the parties have settled their dispute and chances of
conviction are bleak, it is not advisable to continue with the
criminal proceedings, as the criminal Court has already over
burden. In view of the ratio of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case
of Madan Mohan (cited supra), we are satisfied that the First
Information Report and charge-sheet against the applicant Nos.1 to
6 deserves to be quashed and set aside.
8. We therefore, pass the following order.
The First Information Report bearing No.236/20218
dated 21.12.2018, consequent charge-sheet No.09/2019 dated
24.04.2019 and resultant proceedings R.C.C.No.1303/2019 pending
before the 8th Judicial Magistrate First Class, Nagpur and the First
Information Report bearing No.244/2018 dated 30.12.2018,
consequent charge-sheet No.23/2020 dated 06.06.2020 and
resultant proceeding R.C.C.No. 1277/2020 pending before the 8 th
Judicial Magistrate First Class, Nagpur are quashed and set aside.
Rule is made absolute in the above terms.
JUDGE JUDGE RGurnule
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!