Friday, 01, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sheetal Shah And Another vs Advocate Ms. Disha Shetty
2021 Latest Caselaw 3400 Bom

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 3400 Bom
Judgement Date : 23 February, 2021

Bombay High Court
Sheetal Shah And Another vs Advocate Ms. Disha Shetty on 23 February, 2021
Bench: Nitin W. Sambre
                                                  49.1101.21_IAST.doc

ISM

                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                     INTERIM APPLICATION (ST) NO. 1101 OF 2021
                                         IN
                   MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION (ST) NO. 96884 OF 2020

      Sheetal Shah                                                ....Applicant

              V/s.

      Advocate Ms. Disha Shetty and another                       .....Respondents


      Ms. Sheetal Shah Applicant in person
      Ms. Disha Shetty Respondent in person


                               CORAM :   NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.
                               DATE:     FEBRUARY 23, 2021.

      P.C.:

              Heard.

      2]      On 19th January 2021, this Court has passed a detailed order

based on submissions of non-applicant wife as she was intending to

approach the Apex Court and also Hon'ble the Chief Justice of this

Court as according to her, husband and his lawyers who are

appearing before this Court have committed contempt of order of

49.1101.21_IAST.doc

Hon'ble Supreme Court. This Court based on the Judgment in the

matter of Manubhai Pragji Vashi Vs. State of Maharashtra and

others1 has already observed that High Court has no power to

punish for contempt of order of the Hon'ble Supreme Court having

regard to provisions of Section 2(b) and 2(c) of the Contempt of

Courts Act. Hence, this Court cannot entertain the Application being

Interim Application No. 1101 of 2021. Same as such is rejected.

3] Before parting with the order on the Interim Application, this

Court is required to place on record the highly objectionable

conduct of the applicant before this Court. Time and again

applicant is making baseless and wild allegations and at times uses

scandalous language against the counsel for the other side so also

staff of this Court including Registrars, Judges and Staff of Lower

Courts. She is in habit of making unwarranted imputation without

any basis and at times disturbed the peace and decorum in the

Court by using intemperate language. Often the allegations in the

nature of fraud, fake Court seals, fake Court notices are repeatedly

used without any basis. Document produced by the applicant on

1 [1996 (2) MhLJ 615]

49.1101.21_IAST.doc

record of this Court with precipae addressed to the Hon'ble Home

Minister reads thus:

"I, Sheetal Shah, request that the latest crimes done against me which includes generation of fake Bombay High Court orders, fake Court seals, fake Court notices and all crimes done against me in the Bombay High Court, Family Court and in the Hon'ble Metropolitan Magistrate's Court be handed over to the Hon'ble Shri. Ashutosh Dumbare who is the Hon'ble Commissioner, SID, Maharashtra.

I also request that the documents that were sent to the Hon'ble DGP's Office on the 19th of August 2020 be handed over to the Hon'ble Commissioner, SID, Shri. Ashutosh Dumbare.

My protection cover be started by the Special Branch as there have been several attempt made upon my life.

I be given temporary pass to enter Mantralaya for 3 months".

4] Initially this Court was of the view that non-applicant wife, a

woman in distress needs counselling, however, the degree of such

indecent behaviour has increased to highest level. She is not

sensitive to the use of words and language during the Court

proceedings. She is also not sensitive to the fact that she does not

occupy any privileges or higher position while conducting the

matter in the Court than that of an ordinary litigant. I am informed

49.1101.21_IAST.doc

by my Court staff particularly my Private Secretary that as and

when matters are listed before this Court, she used threatening

language against the staff particularly Private Secretary to the

Hon'ble Judge. Officials from the Registry are also not spared by the

non-applicant wife including that of Registrars and staff working

under them.

[NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.]

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter