Friday, 01, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Suraj Janardan Patil vs The State Of Maharashtra And Anr
2021 Latest Caselaw 3292 Bom

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 3292 Bom
Judgement Date : 22 February, 2021

Bombay High Court
Suraj Janardan Patil vs The State Of Maharashtra And Anr on 22 February, 2021
Bench: R.P. Mohite-Dere
                                                                                        19. IA 617-21.doc




                         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                               CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                  INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 617 OF 2021
                                                 IN
                                    CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 159 OF 2021


                Suraj Janardan Patil                                   ...Appellant
                     Versus
                The State of Maharashtra                                ...Respondent


                Ms. Akshata Desai i/b Mr. Nitin Sejpal, Advocate for the Appellant.
                Ms. S. V. Sonawane, A.P.P for the Respondent-State


                                                CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.
                                                MONDAY , 22ND FEBRUARY 2021


                P.C. :


                1.       Heard learned counsel for the parties.



                2.       By this application, the applicant seeks suspension of his sentence

                and enlargement on bail pending the hearing and final disposal of his

                aforesaid appeal.



                3.       The applicant vide judgment and order dated 30th January 2021

                passed by the learned Extra Joint District & Additional Sessions Judge,

Nikita Gadgil                                                                                          1/3




                 ::: Uploaded on - 24/02/2021                     ::: Downloaded on - 24/02/2021 20:49:50 :::
                                                                                          19. IA 617-21.doc



                 Raidgad, Alibag in Special (POCSO) Case No. 29/20, has been convicted

                 and sentenced as under;-

                 - for the offence punishable under Section 11(i) read with Section 12 of the

                 Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act,2012, to suffer simple

                 imprisonment for six months and to pay fine of Rupees 5,000/-, in default,

                 simple imprisonment for one month.



                 4.        The applicant was on bail pending trial as well as post his conviction.

                 It appears that whilst on bail pending trial the applicant has not misused the

                 liberty granted to them. The sentence awarded is a short term sentence and

                 the appeal which is admitted today by a separate order is not likely to be

                 heard in the immediate near future.



                 5.        Considering the aforesaid, the application is allowed and the

                 applicant's sentence is suspended and he is enlarged on bail, pending the

                 hearing and final disposal of his appeal, on the following terms and

                 conditions:

                                                      ORDER

i) The Applicant be enlarged on bail on furnishing P.R. Bond in the

sum of Rs.15,000/- (Rs. Fifteen Thousands Only) with one or two sureties

in the like amount;

Nikita Gadgil                                                                                           2/3





                                                                                           19. IA 617-21.doc



                ii)         The Applicant shall report to the trial Court, once in four months on

the day/date specified by the trial Court, till his Appeal is finally disposed

of;

iii) The Applicant shall keep the trial Court informed of his current

address and mobile contact number and/or change of residence or mobile

details, if any, from time to time;

iv) If there are two consecutive defaults in appearing before the trial

Court, the learned Judge shall make a report to the High Court and the

prosecution would be at liberty to file an application seeking cancellation

of bail.

6. The Application is allowed in the aforesaid terms and is accordingly

disposed of.

7. All concerned to act on the authenticated copy of this order.

REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

Nikita Gadgil                                                                                            3/3





 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter