Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 2866 Bom
Judgement Date : 12 February, 2021
1 19-APL-61-2015.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,
NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APL) NO. 61 OF 2015
Mr. Anil Bhauraoji Tadas,
Aged about : 42 years,
Occupation - Service,
R/o Deoli, Tq. - Deoli,
Dist. - Wardha. ... APPLICANT
VERSUS
1. State of Maharashtra,
Through its P.S.O.
P.S. - Wadgaon Road,
Yavatmal (M.S.).
2. Sayyed Maksood Ali s/o Sayyed
Rashid Ali, Aged about : 46 years,
R/o Sawar, Tq. - Babulgaon,
Dist. - Yavatmal. ... NON-APPLICANTS
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shri Firdos Mirza, Advocate for applicant.
Shri T.A. Mirza, Additional Public Prosecutor for non-applicant
No.1-State.
Shri Mohammad Ateeque, Advocate for non-applicant No.2.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CORAM: Z.A. HAQ & AMIT B. BORKAR, JJ.
DATED : 12/02/2021.
ORAL JUDGMENT : (PER : Z.A. HAQ, J.)
1. Heard.
2. A Society registered under the Societies
Registration Act, 1860 and the Maharashtra Public Trusts Act,
1950 as "Urooje Urdu Education Society, Kalamb (hereinafter
2 19-APL-61-2015.odt
referred to as "the Society") established in 1993-94 is running a
Secondary School at Sawar, Tq. Babhulgaon, Dist. Yavatmal since
1997. The school administered by the Society came to be
recognized for the purpose of grants from the State Exchequer. On
22/06/2014, the non-applicant No.2 lodged a report with the non-
applicant No.1 - Police Station contending that Abdul Kalim Abdul
Kadar, Ex-Secretary of the Society had misappropriated the
amount of grants received from the Education Department during
the period from April, 2011 till July, 2012 and a complaint about
it was made on 02/07/20213 because of which Crime
No.188/2013 was registered for the offences punishable under
Sections 420 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. In the report
lodged by the non-applicant No.2, it was alleged that to appoint
Wasimoddin Lehajoddin Patel as the Headmaster of the school
administered by the Society, Anil Bhauraoji Tadas (present
applicant), Rajendra Wasudeorao Wankhade, Headmaster of Ekta
Madhyamik Vidyalaya, Mendhla, Tq. Kalamb, Dilip Manikrao
Wasekar, President of Ekta Madhyamik Vidyalaya, Mendhla, Tq.
Kalamb and Shoyab S. Shah, Headmaster, Elegant English
Medium School, Ner, Tq. Ner, Dist. Yavatmal had issued bogus
certificates to show that Wasimoddin Patel had requisite
3 19-APL-61-2015.odt
experience for the post of Headmaster as per Rule 3 of the
Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service)
Rules, 1981. In the complaint, it was alleged that on the basis of
the false and bogus certificates, Wasimoddin Patel was appointed
as Headmaster of the school and received salary from the State
Exchequer. On the basis of the report lodged by the non-applicant
No.2, the impugned First Information Report came to be
registered against Wasimmodin Patel, Abdul Kalim Abdul Kadar,
Rajendra Wasudeorao Wankhade, Dilip Manikrao Wasekar,
Shoyab S. Shaha and the applicant, for the offences punishable
under Sections 420, 468, 471, 120-B and Section 34 of the Indian
Penal Code.
The applicant has approached this Court by this
application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure
praying that the First Information Report registered against him be
quashed. By the order dated 18/03/2015, this Court directed
issuance of notice to the non-applicants and further directed that
any coercive action should not be taken against the applicant.
After the non-applicants filed their responses and after hearing the
parties, by the order dated 21/09/2015, Rule came to be issued
and interim order was continued which operates till today.
4 19-APL-61-2015.odt 3. The complaint of the non-applicant No.2 -
Informant in short is that the accused Nos.2 to 6 (including the
applicant) illegally supported the accused No.1 - Wasimoddin
Patel to secure the appointment as Headmaster of the school
administered by the society, and the present applicant in
furtherance of that object, issued false and bogus experience
certificate. According to the non-applicant No.2 - Informant, the
applicant misused his authority as Headmaster of Madhyamik
Vidyalaya Wabgaon, Tq. Deoli, Dist. Wardha and issued bogus
certificate in favour of the accused No.1 - Wasimoddin Patel that
the accused No.1 - Wasimoddin Patel had worked in Madhyamik
Vidyalaya, Wabgaon for the period from 02/07/2001 till
30/04/2002 though the accused No.1 - Wasimoddin Patel never
worked in Madhyamik Vidyalaya, Wabgaon. According to the non-
applicant No.2 - Informant, the applicant misused his authority as
Headmaster of the school and permitted interpolation in the
attendance register and other relevant documents to show that the
accused No.1 - Wasimoddin Patel worked in Madhyamik
Vidyalaya, Wabgaon from 02/07/2001 till 30/04/2002.
5 19-APL-61-2015.odt
4. The facts on record show that the accused No.1 -
Wasimoddin Patel was appointed as the Headmaster of the school
administered by the society by order dated 07/03/2013. The
appointment of accused No.1 - Wasimoddin Patel as the
Headmaster of the school was granted approval by the Education
Officer by communication dated 23/08/2013. Because of the
complaint made by the non-applicant No.2 to the Education
Department, the approval granted to the appointment of applicant
was cancelled by communication dated 19/06/2014. This decision
of cancellation of approval was challenged by the accused No.1 -
Wasimoddin Patel before this Court in Writ Petition
No.3015/2014 which was allowed by the judgment dated
06/04/2015 and the decision of the Education Officer
incorporated in the communication dated 19/06/2014 was set
aside and the Education Officer was directed to reconsider the
matter after hearing Wasimoddin Patel. The Education Officer, by
communication dated 18/05/2015 again cancelled the approval
granted to the appointment of Wasimoddin Patel. This decision is
challenged before this Court by Wasimoddin Patel in Writ Petition
No.5076/2015 in which Rule is issued and the effect and
operation of the decision of the Education Officer is stayed. Writ
6 19-APL-61-2015.odt
Petition No.5076/2015 is pending for adjudication and the interim
order continues in favour of Wasimoddin Patel.
5. At the time of hearing, submissions filed by the
present non-applicant No.2 in Writ Petition No.5076/2015 are
pointed out in which the non-applicant No.2 has stated on oath
that Wasimoddin Patel possessed the requisite experience and
qualifications for being appointed on the post of Headmaster and
a resolution is passed by the society on 03/01/2016 to that effect
and the complaint of the non-applicant No.2 in that regard is not
valid. The non-applicant No.2 has filed his submissions in Writ
Petition No.5076/2015 in the capacity as President of the society.
The net result is that Wasimoddin Patel continues as the
Headmaster of the school administered by the society and is being
paid from the State Exchequer.
In this background, we are examining the legality
of the report lodged by the non-applicant No.2 against the
applicant, voicing grievance that the applicant issued false and
bogus certificates in favour of Wasimoddin Patel on the basis of
which Wasimoddin Patel got appointed as the Headmaster of the
school.
7 19-APL-61-2015.odt
6. We find that except for the bald averments of the
non-applicant No.2 in the report lodged by him that the accused
Nos.2 to 6 (including the present applicant) illegally supported
Wasimoddin Patel to secure the appointment on the post of
Headmaster of the school by supplying false and bogus
documents/certificates, there is no material on record to show
that the applicant was aware that the experience certificate issued
by him in favour of Wasimoddin Patel was to be used by
Wasimoddin Patel for such purpose. We find that in the
experience certificate, it was stated that Wasimoddin Patel had
worked in Madhyamik Vidyalaya, Wabgaon from 02/07/2001 till
30/04/2002 as an untrained teacher. It is well settled law that to
lay charge of cheating, the preliminary requirement of intention of
the accused at the inception should be fulfilled, which is lacking in
the present case.
As we find that the material on record is not
sufficient to justify the registration of First Information Report
against the applicant for the offence punishable under Section 420
of the Indian Penal Code, the registration of the offence
punishable under Section 468 of the Indian Penal Code also
cannot be sustained. The registration of First Information Report
8 19-APL-61-2015.odt
against the applicant for the offence punishable under Section 471
of the Indian Penal Code also does not withstand the scrutiny of
law as there is nothing on record to even remotely suggest that the
applicant had issued the experience certificate in favour of
Wasimoddin Patel for the purpose as alleged. Even going by the
accusations made by the non-applicant No.2, the complaint is that
Wasimoddin Patel has used the forged experience certificate as
genuine. It is not understood as to how the First Information
Report can be registered in such facts against the applicant for the
offence punishable under Section 471 of the Indian Penal Code.
7. On scrutiny of the matter, we find that the non-
applicant No.2 had abused the process of law and process of Court
with ulterior motive. The non-applicant No.2 filed complaint
against Wasimoddin Patel and challenged his appointment as the
Headmaster of the school of the society on the ground that he was
not having the requisite experience, and then after becoming
President of the society, a resolution is passed by the society
stating that now, Wasimoddin Patel fulfills the requirement of
experience and qualifications and therefore, he is appointed
permanently on the post of Headmaster of the school
administered by the society of which the non-applicant No.2 is the
9 19-APL-61-2015.odt
President. We fail to understand that as to how the appointment
of Wasimoddin Patel, if illegal at its inception can be regularized
subsequently without appointing him by following due procedure
for appointment on that post. Be that as it may, we are not
required to delve into those issues in the present matter. However,
we have dealt with this aspect to examine the conduct of the non-
applicant No.2.
8. We find that the report lodged by the non-applicant
No.2 against the applicant is not only unsustainable in law but is
vexatious. In our view, continuation of criminal proceedings
against the applicant, who happens to be the Headmaster of
Secondary School since last more than 20 years will result in
unnecessary harassment of applicant and would be an abuse of
process of Court.
9. Hence, we pass the following order :-
i] The First Information Report No.327/2014
registered against the applicant with the non-
applicant No.1 - Police Station is quashed.
ii] As we find that the report lodged by the non-
applicant No.2 against the applicant is vexatious,
10 19-APL-61-2015.odt
and looking to the facts which have come on record,
we impose costs of Rs.1,00,000/- on the non-
applicant No.2.
iii] The amount of Rs.1,00,000/- shall be
deposited by the non-applicant No.2 with the
Registry of this Court till 20/03/2021. On deposit of
amount of Rs.1,00,000/-, Rs.50,000/- be given to
the applicant and Rs.50,000/- be given to the office
of Government Pleader, Nagpur Bench, Nagpur in
Library Fund for making available video-
conferencing facility in the Government Pleader's
Office.
iv] If the amount of Rs.1,00,000/- is not deposited
by the non-applicant No.2 with the Registry of this
Court till 20/03/2021, issue bailable warrant
against the non-applicant No.2 - Sayyed Maksood
Ali s/o Sayyed Rashid Ali to secure his presence
before this Court on 31/03/2021.
JUDGE JUDGE Choulwar
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!