Friday, 01, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Bhupsing Surgyansing vs The State Of Maharashtra
2021 Latest Caselaw 2830 Bom

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 2830 Bom
Judgement Date : 11 February, 2021

Bombay High Court
Bhupsing Surgyansing vs The State Of Maharashtra on 11 February, 2021
Bench: R.P. Mohite-Dere
           Digitally
           signed by
Shagufta   Shagufta Q.
           Pathan
Q.         Date:                                                                19-IA-446-2021.doc
Pathan     2021.02.12
           17:14:47
           +0530

                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                  CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                            CRIMINAL INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 446 OF 2021
                                                IN
                                  CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 125 OF 2021

                  Bhupsing Surgyansing                                  ...Applicant
                      Versus
                  The State of Maharashtra                              ...Respondent


                  Ms. Paavani Chadha for the Applicant

                  Mr. P. H. Gaikwad-Patil, A.P.P for the Respondent-State


                                             CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.
                                             THURSDAY, 11th FEBRUARY 2021


                  P.C. :


                  1            Heard learned counsel for the parties.



                  2            By this application, the applicant seeks suspension of his

                  sentence and enlargement on bail, pending the hearing and final disposal

                  of the appeal.



                  3            The applicant, along with other co-accused, vide judgment and

                  order dated 10th December 2020 passed by learned Special Judge,

     SQ Pathan                                                                                 1/5
                                                                      19-IA-446-2021.doc


            Kolhapur, in MPID Case No. 1/2013, has been convicted and sentenced as

            under:-


                 -     for the offence punishable under Section 420 r/w 34 of the

                 Indian Penal Code, to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 7 years and

                 to pay fine of Rs.5,000/-, in default of payment of fine, to undergo

                 simple imprisonment for 3 months;


                 -     for the offence punishable under Section 120B of the Indian

                 Penal Code, to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 7 years and to pay

                 fine of Rs.5,000/-, in default of payment of fine, to undergo simple

                 imprisonment for 3 months;


                 -     for the offence punishable under Section 3 of the Maharashtra

                 Protection of Interest of Depositors (In Financial Establishment) Act,

                 to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 6 years and to pay fine of

                 Rs.1,00,000/-, in default of payment of fine, to undergo simple

                 imprisonment for 6 months;


                 -     for the offence punishable under Section 4 of the Prize Chits

                 and Money Circulation Schemes (Banning) Act, to suffer rigorous


SQ Pathan                                                                           2/5
                                                                          19-IA-446-2021.doc


                  imprisonment for 3 years and to pay fine of Rs.5,000/-, in default of

                  payment of fine, to undergo simple imprisonment for 3 months;


                  -     for the offence punishable under Section 5 of the Prize Chits

                  and Money Circulation Schemes (Banning) Act, to suffer rigorous

                  imprisonment for 2 years and to pay fine of Rs.3,000/-, in default of

                  payment of fine, to undergo simple imprisonment for 3 months;


                  -     for the offence punishable under Section 6 of the Prize Chits

                  and Money Circulation Schemes (Banning) Act, to suffer rigorous

                  imprisonment for 2 years and to pay fine of Rs.3,000/-, in default of

                  payment of fine, to undergo simple imprisonment for 3 months;


                  All the sentences were directed to run concurrently.


            4           It is not in dispute that the applicant was on bail pending trial

            and has not misused or abused the liberty granted to him. The applicant

            has deposited the fine amount as awarded by the trial Court. The appeal

            has been admitted by a separate order passed today. The sentence awarded

            is a short term sentence.




SQ Pathan                                                                               3/5
                                                                         19-IA-446-2021.doc


            5           Having heard learned counsel for the applicant, the applicant

            has made out a case for suspension of his sentence and enlargement on bail.


            6           Accordingly, the application is allowed and the applicant's

            sentence is suspended and he is enlarged on bail, pending the hearing and

            final disposal of his appeal, on the following terms and conditions :-

                                              ORDER

(i) The applicant be released on cash bail in the sum of

Rs. 50,000/-, for a period of eight weeks;

(ii) The applicant shall within the said period of eight weeks,

furnish P.R. Bond in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- with one or two local

solvent sureties in the like amount;

iii) The applicant shall report to the trial Court, once in three

months on the day/date specified by the trial Court, till his appeal is

finally disposed of;

iv) The applicant shall keep the trial Court informed of his

current address and mobile contact number and/or change of

residence or mobile details, if any, from time to time;

SQ Pathan                                                                               4/5
                                                                      19-IA-446-2021.doc




                v)            If there are two consecutive defaults      in appearing

before the trial Court, the learned Judge shall make a report to the

High Court and the prosecution would be at liberty to file an

application seeking cancellation of bail.

7 The application is disposed of accordingly.

8 All concerned to act on the authenticated copy of this order.

REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

SQ Pathan                                                                             5/5
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter